Premise of the question, yes, google was Hiding Information from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing and this and many other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led by a noted man of science, the name sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. They did this in one swoop by organizing a letter to the land, standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronavirus
it turns out we can use human engineering to help address climate change. tucker: here s a tip. anyone who uses the phraser: robust ethical frameworkho wouldn t know ethics if they got in the shower with them. you know that because he uses the phrase, human engineering. human engineering? the name alone should make you pause and take a deep breath. people are not buttons. you can t just add rebar and improve the human condition, much less come in the human soul. people are living beings. they are alive. we outlined his proposal in a recent paper in ethics policy and environment. in that paper, he suggests a solution to the problem of people eating hamburgers. how do we get them to stop eating hamburgers? not convincing them that hamburgers are bad, you tell people something, and if they
it turns out we can use human engineering to help address climate change. tucker: here s a tip, anyone who uses the phrase, robust ethical framework wouldn t know ethics if they got in the shower with them. you know that perfect because he uses the phrase, human engineering. human engineering? the name alone should make you pause and take a deep breath. people are not buttons. you can t just add it. much less come in the human soul. people are living beings. they are alive. we outlined his proposal in a recent paper in ethics policy and environment. in that paper, he suggests a solution to the problem of people eating hamburgers. how do we get them to stop eating hamburgers? not convincing them that hamburgers are bad, you tell
to report illegal immigrants who are buying guns. it s illegal for illegal immigrants to attempt top purchase a firearm. that s not unreasonable. 10 years ago democrats would have supported that. they are making more out of this. the right is making a bit more out of this. judge jeanine: you agree that illegals should be reported if they try to buy a gun. of course. judge jeanine: one thing i like about aoc is her cow thing, the cow emissions. if you watched my show, you know what i m talking about. she adds to it and says the cow flatulence has an impact on climate change. so she says i m not going to force everyone to go vegan, but we have to address factory farming, and maybe we shouldn t be eating hamburgers for breakfast, lunch and dinner. is that somewhat of a
are buying guns. it s illegal for illegal immigrants to attempt top purchase a firearm. that s not unreasonable. 10 years ago democrats would have supported that. they are making more out of this. the right is making a bit more out of this. judge jeanine: you agree that illegals should be reported if they try to buy a gun. of course. judge jeanine: one thing i like about aoc is her cow thing, the cow emissions. if you watched my show, you know what i m talking about. she adds to it and says the cow flatulence has an impact on climate change. so she says i m not going to force everyone to go vegan, but we have to address factory farming, and maybe we shouldn t be eating hamburgers for breakfast, lunch and dinner. is that somewhat of a