super durp jourduper journalism super durp duper journalism super duper journalism awards. greg: i don t know. so this is where we honor writers who impress us with their brave journalistic pursuits and tonight s winner, we get right to it, jeremy bailey a writer for the rap an entertainment web site. friday he broke a major story about a famous tv anchor saying something shockingly disgusting to a co-anchor. i believe we have tape of what actually caused the uproar. a lot of these homeless services that are getting a lot of money, more and more money, it s not working. the solution is, in listening to the homeless, like the woman who says we are spoiled, we need tough love or we re never going to get off the street. greg, what do you think about that approach? greg: i agree with everything the little lady says and i m sorry about the cart: now did you catch that, panelist greg gutfeld otherwise known as me referred to dana perino as a little lady. talk about a mi
the beat with ari melber starts now. happy friday. happy friday, nicole. hope you enjoy your weekend. it s been quite a week. welcome to the the beat. i m ari melber here on the beet both beet. up top, there are a lot more developments in the unprecedented story that broke last night. if you have been busy, you maybe didn t hear it. the new york times dropping this bombshell news that donald trump is likely to be indicted in new york. tonight trump s lawyers acknowledge a key point in that account. the d.a. has indeed invited donald trump to testify to the grand jury. this isn t hypothetical. this isn t some day. this is next week. an invite to testify next week according to trump lawyers. they are in florida over the weekend discussing strategy, taking this as a real thing. seriously, they tell nbc news they have no plans to meet with the manhattan d.a. mr. bragg. so, let s get some clarity up top. there are many stories we cover we say here is this thing and here ar
explicit in our constitution, protect a constitutional right and yet when predators schumer asked me repeatedly do you find that roe versus wade established and recognized a constitutional protection for a woman to make this most private decision you, wouldn t answer. you wouldn t give a direct answer. on two supreme court cases, griswold and brown, now, you have said, just right as we started this hearing, that you believe that we have a constitutional basis for this protection and this right. and yet when it came to roe v. wade, you would not. most of us are troubled by this 1985 memo. you said yesterday you would have an open mind when you give them to this issue but i m sorry to report that your memo is taking a job in the reagan administration is not evidence of an open mind. it evidence is a mind that sadly is closed in some areas. yesterday when you were asked about one man one vote, you clarified it and said, those were my fears and, they are not my face now. when sen
leaked draft opinion which seeks to overturn the row case his nomination heari we can with justice sapping alito the new draft on that six to overturn the roe case. his nomination hearing was held in january 2006. you conceded the fact that we have free speech because it s explicit in our constitution, protect it constitutional right, and yet when senator schumer asked repeatedly, do you find that roe versus established and recognize a constitutional protection to private decision, you wouldn t dancer. you wouldn t give a direct answer. on to supreme court cages griswold and brown, you have said, as we started this hearing. that you believe there is a constitutional basis for this protection, and for this right. and yet when we came roses right, you would not. of us are troubled by the 1985 memo. you said yesterday you would have an open mind when you give them to this issue but i m sorry general point that your memo is taking a job in the reagan administration is not evi
wade case and abortion being widely debated and discussed in the nation today american history tv is looking back to see what the nine justices who are currently on the supreme court had to say about roe v wade in their confirmation hearings. we begin with justice samuel alito the author of the new leaked draft opinion which seeks to overturn the row case his nomination hearing was held in january 2006 you conceded the fact that we have free speech because it s explicit in our constitution protected constitutional, right? and yet when senator schumer asked to repeatedly do you find that roe versus wade established and recognized a constitutional protection for a woman to make this most private decision? you wouldn t answer you wouldn t give a direct answer. on two supreme court cases griswold and brown now you have said just right there as we started this hearing that you believe there is a constitutional basis for this protection and for this right and yet when it came to ro