now you re seeing all the democrats on the judicial committee in the house saying they want a criminal investigation of jeff sessions. i do think there are issues here. i m not discounting the issues at all. the investigations are going to continue. but as katherine mentioned, the investigation that the investigation in november an december came to the conclusion that there was no collusion, collaboration or communication beyond mike flynn, obviously didn t know the meeting with ambassador of russia with senator sessions. dana: how explosive is it or potentially explosive, that you now have this report that obama administration officials were planting seeds around washington to leave clues for investigators before they left on january 20th? to me, i think that that would be pretty earth shaking in d.c. it is. and i think there are a lot of
into a pool and coming up being wet. it s what fifa is. it has defined fifa. the godfather metaphor is very apt. you know what is surprising and this is why so many of us woke up this morning and our jaws hit the floor when we heard this news. this time it looks like the charges actually have some teeth. this is the first time the u.s. justice department has ever gone after fifa. the fact two vice presidents are among those arrested is a big deal. there s only one person above the vice presidents. this could be the end of fifa as we know it. so this is a huge deal. earth shaking, number one headline news across the world right now.
movement of this country has embraced their version of the constitution as a fundamental aspect of what they believe in. more than the democrats have, frankly. republicans talk about the constitution more than the democrats do these days. and if the balance could go from 5-4 republican to 5-4 democrat, the implications would be earth shaking. you know, sam, i think a lot of people have gotten, especially young people have gotten comfortable with ro roe v. wade and a lot of people think these landmark decisions like brown or the positive review of the civil rights act in 64 had to happen. i can imagine even under this court today the court we have right now saying no to the civil rights bill. i don t know which way roberts would go on a similar question. these issues are close right now. you know, it s complicated.
aspect of what they believe in. more than the democrats have, frankly. republicans talk about the constitution more than the democrats do these days, and if the balance could go from 5 to 4 republican to 5 to 4 democrat, the implications would be earth shaking. you know, sam, i think a lot of people have gotten, especially young people, have gotten comfortable with roe v. wade. they don t know what it was like in their mother s age, their father s age. a lot of people think the landmark decisions like brown or roe v. wade or the public school prayer decision or certainly they read positive review of the simple rights act in 64 had to happen. i can imagine even under this court today, the court we have right now, saying no to the civil rights bill. it doesn t work there for interstate commerce. i don t know which way roberts would go on a similar question. those issues are close right now. it s complicated. one of the cases that could be considered is the voting rights act. that co
embraced their version of the constitution as a fundamental aspect of what they believe in. more than the democrats have, frankly. republicans talk about the constitution more than the democrats do these days, and if the balance could go from 5 to 4 republican to 5 to 4 democrat, the implications would be earth shaking. you know, sam, i think a lot of people have gotten, especially young people, have gotten comfortable with roe v wade. they don t know what it was like in nar mother s age, their father s age. a lot of people that i the landmark decisions like brown or roe v. wade or the public school prayer decision or certainly they read positive review of the simple rights act in 64 had to happen. i can imagine even under this court today, the court we have right now, saying no to the civil rights bill. it doesn t work there for interstate commerce. i don t know which way roberts would go on a similar question. those issues are close right now. it s complicated. one of the cases