secretary s track record. mrs. clinton is going to have to defend her track record of lying about benghazi, of lying about the e-mails and servers. the question is who is going to prosecute hillary clinton. obama has no interest. justice department has no interest. it is time to put a former federal prosecutor on the same stage as hillary cloin ton. i can t wait to stand on the debate stage against hillary clinton and make it clear if you vote for hillary clinton you are voting for the ayatollah khomeini. he was tweeting about the debate he didn t have anything nice to say about the republican candidates. the prime time stage not just an 11-way contest. back to you in new york. peter doocy live in new york. thanks, better. the time is about 15 minutes after the top of the hour. the library bearing ronald
is our political panel director of the accountability and william f. buckley fellow of the national review. we stayed up late to watch the debate. who is the winner off tn the economy? that s such an important issue in the polls right now. without a doubt carly fiorina. she came knowing her stats, her facts. she understands how government works, she understands where spending is, she has a plan. she got us the details. not one person on stage could debate her on the economy. she has a lot of experience running companies. i think carly did a good job but i am going to say bush because the expectations were high here. very high for him. he had a lot to lose. i think he performed well on this issue. his closing statement was very strong. he sounded executive. loser when it comes to the economy. you choose carson. without a doubt. he didn t come prepared. he didn t bring his a game. he had the most to lose in this
debate because he was surging in the polls. this was an opportunity to speak to the general audience to move to a moderate demographic at east in the room in california. he didn t have facts or figures. he wasn t that exciting either. who did you choose again. you are crabbing trump. he was almost completely absent from policy debates. if the angle is we need to elect a businessman that businessman should be able to tell us why as a ceo we will be able to lift the economy. i think carly and others had a devastating attack on fiscal mismanagement of his casinos. immigration. who do you think the winner is? rubio. i will qualify this. i think there s a lot of skepticism about gang of 8 about getting effectively rolled by chuck schumer. i thought he made the right noises to combat this. he was specific on policies. he did hedge on amnesty that
freedom and liberty, warm, fuzzy rhetoric i think connects. hold up your losers. losers for military who did you pick? you picked paul? i actually picked jeb bush. thank you so much for being with us. interesting perspective from both of you. heather, over to you. thank you very much. how did the candidates rank among voters? pollster frank luntz has reaction from his focus group. how many of you thought chris christie did a good job. raise your hand. he seemed genuine. there was bickering going back and forth between fiorina and trump he brought it back to what it should be about. brought it back to the american people. ted cruz in tonight s debate? inspiring. straight shooter. solid. he s an outsider but he s proven. bold. honest. scott walker tonight? surprising. record. better than the fox debate.
welcome back. what a night. you are watching fox and frindz first. we talked a lot about the debate. what are the plans for the economy. cheryl casone joining us with more on this. good morning, cheryl. good morning, heather. last night s debate focused on iran, hillary and more. but it s still the economy that americans want to hear about. with two ceo s on the stage last night it was expected their track record would come to life. when carly fiorina it was bankruptcy in atlantic city that she used. politicians have run up mountains of debt using other people s money. that is in fact precisely the way you ran your casinos. and you were forced to file for bankruptcy not once, not twice, four times. why should we trust you?