To lobby. Thank you, sir. What is the difference his winged democrat and a socialist . What is the difference . Betty Wasserman Shultz refused to say. Can you tell me what the difference is . I think traditionally there have been major differences between socialist and the democratic party. The role of government. More specifically. We are at the end. If you want to talk afterwards. There has been a major major difference, as to the role of government, at the role of the private sector. I mean, i think liberal democrats like myself have dedicated ourselves to try to make the Free Enterprise system work, to change it, to make it more responsive to the needs, to find a blend between individual initiative and ingenuity and innovation and the role of government. To find the right balance. Socialism has traditionally had a different balance. The u. S. Senate is back in session today after the president s day recess. Table gavel in at 3 00 eastern starting with annual reading of George Washi
Our responses, and all the science and so forth throughout all of them, thats a great deal of work that also has to be done. So any further elements that are introduced where we are to prioritize this or that are other opportunities just like the r. E. M. S. To delay things where things are fair. We need to respond to directions from some other body. Most of generics are still decreasing in price. So this is a problem for a small area. The report shows that for the medicaid spending, prices for generics went down for 64 of the drugs over the last several years. That silver slice you were talking about, thats really what you were the silver slice is the innovator drugs dont have any generic competition. And no submission. And no submission, yeah. Nobody waiting. Nobody waiting. Or things are complex drugs, they might be ones that dont have a bioequivalence test. Orphans, the market space may just be too small. If you have four or five other entrants into that space, then they are not go
Brookings institution. This is over an hour. Good morning, everyone, and on behalf of brookings and our center for 21st century security, were honored to have the chief of staff of the army, general ray odierno, to speak. You are aware of the challenges of the budget process and our future military planning as well as current operations. No one could be more distinguished and a more thoughtful person to discuss these matters than general odierno, who is a friend of brookings and the broader Defense Community for a long time, and he has been a distinguished servant in our nations military and defense throughout that time. He took the Fourth Infantry Division to iraq and presided over its operation, directed its operations in the first year of the iraq war. Then he returned as the Multinational Force Corps Commander and was along with David Petraeus and ryan crocker one of the key three american architects of the surge. Search. From december 2006 through the early time of 2008, he was th
With you. I have gotten to know many of you during the course of some very difficult weeks, and your courage and love for each other and your communities shines through every single day and we could not be more blessed and grateful for your loved ones who gave everything they had on behalf of our kids. As we await the president , lets go to our panel. Mark glaze is director of mayors against illegal guns and karen finney is former dn C Communications director and also an msnbc political analyst. Good day to you both. Mark, i want to talk about some of the points that the president is expected to make in a moment, but first lets talk about that rebuttal by the great Wayne Lapierre. Whats most amazing is that it did not at all mirror his barely concealed nativism which was on display in an editorial release that day. Hurricanes tornadoes, riots, terrorists, gangs, lone criminals, these are perils we are sure to face, not just maybe. Its not paranoia to buy a gun. Its survival. Its respon