American peoples money on this impeachment, theres so many other important things that are going undone. Within this committees own jurisdiction, we should be addressing the opioid epidemic. We could be working together to find a solution to our immigration and asylum challenges on our southern border. We could be protecting americans from having their intellectual property and jobs stolen by chinese companies. And we could be enhancing Election Security just to name a few things. And congress as a whole could be working on rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure. Providing additional tax relief to the nations middleclass families and providing additional security to our people here at home and abroad. Instead, here we are spinning our wheels once again on impeachment. What a waste. The American People deserve so much better. I yield back. Gentleman yields back. Mr. Cohen. Thank you, mr. Chair. I take no pleasure in the fact that were here today. As a patriot who loves america, it pain
Best HAMMER headphones and earbuds: Top picks for the ultimate audio experience
livemint.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from livemint.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
line in the sand that we are going to resist efforts by state legislatures to mess with the integrity of the election, including the 2024 election. in other words, was this case directly connected to january six and the scheme to reject joe biden s electors? yeah, it is the same legal theory that a lot of the january 6th stuff was based on, which is the idea that state legislators are in control and can call all of the shots. indeed, john eastman who many describe as the arc type of president trump s january six theory, even filed a breeze in the u.s. supreme court in this case trying to pedal this theory, a theory that has now been resounded lee rejected by the court. i think one interesting thing about the case is that most people thought we were going to lose this case, including people on our site. in fact, almost all the lawyers on our side for different parties tried to tell the supreme court, get rid of this case. do not decide this case, you do
that mr. giuliani was pushing. professor feldman, what would the framers have thought of a president who only cares about the quote, big stuff that benefits him? the framers were extremely worried about a president who served only his own interests or the interests of foreign powers. that was their most serious concern when they designed the remedy of impeachment. so the evidence also suggests that president trump didn t even care if the investigation actually happened. what he really cared about was the public announcement of the investigation. so, professor karlan, how do we analyze these facts in the context of abuse of power? well, i think that to have a president ask for the investigation of his political opponents is an arc type of the abuse of power. and mr. buck mentioned past examples of this. and to say that those weren t impeachable i think is a big
enough for me to have assaulted. implicit, that is if they are attractive enough maybe you would have done it? right? and then you have well, two pieces. having my rick perry moment here. forgot my third point. melania is in a tough position. she s the candidate s spouse. natural to want to defend your husband. but i don t think it s credible when she says it was billy bush s fault he egged him on. i live to that tape, that s not how i saw it. i don t think billy bush pushed trump into saying those things. he was bragging. mateo, was the interview pro, help for for donald trump and his campaign or hurt his campaign? i think it told us something about the thinking inside the campaign. they put melania in an all too familiar political arc type. right? wife standing by her husband when he s been accused of some kind of inappropriate behavior. hoe wouldn t have done that and kept that story alive if he didn t feel this was hurting
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.