he wants the make calls about nothing with the presidency. i m just doing my work as a federal employee. it would be a complete e vis raof what is and is not your role as an officer. he had any number of responsibilities to serve the president in that capacity. nothing tied to the campaign would have been within that scope. nothing tied to campaign litigation would have been in that scope. the federal government, the executive branch is excluded from these parts of the process of deciding who won the presidency. there s no role for the white house there. i was just happy that mark meadows testified today. that s something we didn t get on the january 6th committee. going back to the evidentiary hearing. it wasn t an issue of facts. it was an issue of interpretation of law. you have the mark meadows said, saying there s broad powers of the scope of chief of staff. and you have the litigators saying it was a call of raffensperger. it s what is an official duty