discussed at this particular interview? in the april interview, the first one, they discussed everything you d expect. the devices she used, the devices secretary clinton used. her e-mail security. they confronted her with classified messages. hey, how did that end up there. the december interview is more focused on the e-mails discovered in a separate investigation into her husband, anthony weiner, who had been sexting with a 15-year-old. they were asking huma, how did your e-mails end up on his computer. some of them seemed to have been forwarded. some of them got there by an automated backup process. she told agents she was like unaware totally how they would have gotten there, but they were driving at how did those get there and why didn t you tell us before that this computer might be an issue. so we can look at it way back when. what do we know of her role in this? is she being regarded as a witness? regarded as something more than that? what is your reporting tell us about h
redacted. and i won t be pranking you any longer. point made. i am just a dude with an iphone. you need the tighten up i.t. policy. love xx. here s the thing that i find amazing about this. just remember that they, the trump campaign managed to make a central issue before the republic in the last campaign, e-mail security. 33,000 e-mails. if she can t protect her e-mail server, how can she frequent country? now that we know the president still uses his regular phone and you can reach him on his number. it is and not just one person who is pranked. we have high level people with security clearance who are e-mailing and talking about, right now in this case, wasn t incredibly sensitive. we re talking about soiree and inside baseball, if you will.
charge of cyber security to voluntarily offer up his own personal e-mail address to a person he thought it was president s son-in-law, jared kushner. inviting him to a fancy dinner. to that, we are arranging a pit of a soiree toward the end of all. he wrote back, thanks, jarrod. with a promise like that, i can t refuse. my personal e-mail is redacted. and i won t be pranking you any longer. point made. i am just a dude with an iphone. you need the tighten up i.t. policy. love xx. here s the thing that i find amazing about this. just remember that they, the trump campaign managed to make a central issue before the republic in the last campaign, e-mail security. 33,000 e-mails.
event to dislodge reagan support in the upcoming election. now that was treason. accepting wikileaks that they actually hacked out of the system involuntarily and said we want to know what information you have. that s just the american people getting more information. so you re saying that stolen information is an appropriate thing to be leaked by a foreign power. would you like it if russia hacked your e-mails and produced ten years of your g mail account? had all of us reading through whatever is in your e-mails. whatever stolen information put out for everyone in the world to see. well, for one thing what we need to do is focus on e-mail security. but when you are a public official, you know that you are the target of such hacking. that s number one. when we are talking about this particular case, let s figure out. what s worse hillary destroyed e-mails that were
community nervous about the clip tons they seem to play by different rules. i think it s that sense of disrespect for the system that s animating a lot of the anger now. that was stimulating, jesse. but what he s saying, she s treat k this as a trivial matter that other people treated very seriously. she might have to start shopping for pant suits with prison stripes pretty soon. i think the only people ready for hillary are federal investigators. look what happened. petraeus, okay? he had classified information at home. and he gave it to his american biographer. who also had a clearance. yes. hillary had classified information, also at home, and she gave it to russian hackers and chinese hackers. most likely. i think that s worse. you think? it goes to the point she doesn t care about e-mail security or embassy security. she doesn t care about border security. and we re supposed to trust her with the codes to the nuclear football. what is she going to leave anytime ladies