ceo of an online agency and he tells us what he believes the bbc should do in managing the crisis. right now the have do in managing the crisis. right now they have to do in managing the crisis. right now they have to get do in managing the crisis. right now they have to get off do in managing the crisis. right now they have to get off the do in managing the crisis. right now they have to get off the back- they have to get off the back foot, they have to get off the back foot, they are firefighting, the corporate channels are clearly not working and they need to do something to get ahead of the story because legally there is very little they can actually say. there is very little they can actually say- there is very little they can actually say. there is very little they can actuall sa. ., ., ., , actually say. what would you advise them to do in actually say. what would you advise them to do in terms actually say. what would you advise them to do in terms of actually say
we talk about a duty, and reasonable care, do you not have that. rick: does the dream have tem have a responsibility to warn people? there is another side to this, joking aside, it is a straight negligence case. in other words, not marble is way too hot, and they breach a duty of care, not is sound like a lawyer, they owe a duty care not to have a bench that is so hot. when all the jokes and sarcasm subside she is claiming third-degree buns. that is not a job but a serious level of burn. the evidence does the talking. if there is evidence of third-degree burns, then it is a serious matter. rick: do you think the judge towns the other cheek, and throws this out. randy: it will be quite a bummer for this woman, unless she is planning on suing the