voters should decide, period. jeanine: go to the money now. who goatsets a million dollars the arkansas lottery. woman buys a ticket and the woman a woman who owns a garbage can the ticket was thrown into and the woman is a dumpster diver and goes in and pulls out the ticket. who gets the money. the woman who owns the garbage can. it is hers. go to the mens rea. and the woman with the lottery ticket throws it away and gave it up. good-bye. he s out. jeanine: she has a sign, don t tamper with my garage. she claims that but, you mentioned scalia. if the garbage can is on the street. open game. jeanine: the person threw it away, joey. the person who took the ticket and possesses it, possession, 9/10 of the law, it is theirs. talk about the garbage let me finish. they own the garbage, if the proprietor of the establishment wanted it to be private and want
i don t think it s going to win. i m still for the dumpster diver. megyn: if dumpster diver was effectively stealing out of a bin that said do not take. because it didn t say do not take until after the ticket was taken. that s like putting a beware of dog sign out after the postman gets bit. megyn: who puts a do not take sign on the trash can? apparently this was a pattern by the woman who won. you can get prizes if you get a bunch of discarded lottery tickets. here is my question for you. i m confused because reading the articles suggest the woman who original think scratched and failed to seat winnings has joined the lawsuit on her own behalf and also sif read she joined trying support the store manager saying that when she
threw it in the garbage she said here are some tickets for lisa or some store worker. which is it? obviously the scratcher goes with the owner, we ll have more of a chance against the dumpster diver. but i m going for sharon jones the dumpster diver. megyn: if the woman who originally bought the tickets and failed to scratch, but now is telling two different stories. i get and if i don t get it the store manager gets. she is out. i m voting for the original purchaser. maybe she could share. she could share if she gets the money. megyn: it s $680,000 after taxes. in three minutes how one cat growrngd a full plane of passengers. oh common. and how can you talk to me about fiber
deserves it. she got lucky. she is out. in the scratcher s defense. she claimed that she did a little scratchen and then she got tired and she scanned its. the scanner said it was a loser. which is why she says said, no, no, i m still the rightful owner. is that going to fly? maybe she could sue the lottery commission? maybe the tickets are defectively designed so you have to have a special degree to make sure old dumpster diver didn t have trouble knowing it was a winner? i m just saying why do you need to scan it. why can t you look down and say 38s or three diamonds. why can t you use your eyes to tell you whether you won or not?
is the rightful owner. joining me now is former prosecutor jonna spilbor and fox news analyst lis weihl. this is straight out of a law school essay. let me start with you, jonna. who wins. buyer of the ticket in the woman who found it in the dumpster or the store manager? i m representing the original purchaser and here is why. i m looking at this as if this lotto ticket in the garbage, a million dollar winner did not get there on purpose. so there is a duty to try to ascertain the original purchaser. she didn t scratch enough. she didn t do her job scratching. she shouldn t get a penny unless sharon jones wants to give herb money. dumpster diver miss jones, she