working on this, he might be a crazy dude. but if there s corroborating information, that might have been about something real, because him and flynn did meet and have a relationship. that implicates at least flynn, if not the trump campaign more broadly in what smith was doing. yes. that s a really good point. he could be a crazy person and some of his friends think he was a deluded old man. but he wasn t crazy in the way he went about it. he formed a company, he had a dummy e-mail account where he had people leave drafts but didn t want them to send e-mails. and he was raising money from at least four donors, raising at least $100,000. and did he pay hackers? he said he was in touch with five groups of hackers. two of them he believed were russian and had ties to the kremlin. you know, it raises questions about whether or not he was crazy and if he was very aware of what he was doing and whether or not what he was doing was
to me, that s the super clarifying thing about this story. i followed every incremental development. the reporting team on this has just been amazing. thank you. for me, this is like we ve now taken a turn. without knowing anything about peter smith other than his activism, him dropping lots of names, don t worry, this is legit, the trump campaign has me working on this, he might be a crazy dude. but if there s corroborating information, that might have been about something real, because him and flynn did meet and have a relationship. that implicates at least flynn, if not the trump campaign more broadly in what smith was doing. yes. that s a really good point. he could be a crazy person and some of his friends think he was a deluded old man. who was on a crazy mission to get clinton s e-mails. but he wasn t crazy in the way he went about it. he formed a company, he had a dummy e-mail account where he had people leave drafts but didn t want them to send
witnessed what actually happened which means you probably have reasonable doubt about what happened. but you said something that was really interesting about the fact that she changed her story. the truth of the matter is i think this case hinges what happened on the ledge but what the jury believes what happened in the days following the accident or the murder and what they think it means. and one of the things that they will learn is that she created a dummy e-mail account, an e-mail account that she pretended was from somebody named tony. and from this account, she sent from this nonexistent tony an e-mail to herself saying he jumped off the ledge. it never happened. well, there s a lot of hooey about this case. for starters, she lied in the days after the event to friends and relatives who were all on the stand corroborating and testifying for the fact that she lied to them about it. she then created the fake e-mail