this is institution classification committee. this is for administrative segregation inmates and this is a due process issue where we bring them in, review why they re in ad seg and, you know, go over the issues of why they re locked up in ad seg and what they can expect from here. name and cdc number, sir. math knew matthew nasholm, 245854. today s classification committee is warden ayres. you were at corcoran state prison, referred to our csr for transfer, csr approved and you were retained. you have done your shoe related time. therefore, the recommendation is to release you to the rcgp. okay. do you have any problems with being released? yes, i got a problem to gp because i m not a gp. i dropped out. you in a gang? yes, i am affiliated with a gang, yes.
he commented on one and not on other. this appears to be an inconency. the distinction with the al franken case, when you look at the fact and the evidence in front of you, there is an actual picture that showed what transpired. he admitted and apologizeded. it s less of a due process issue as to what happened and so many years ago. it s more compelling evidence. that was one of the things, juan, that came up in the briefing. the question that al franken apologized for allegations against others are still allegations. that s why the attack was worth while. your thoughts? to my mind there is a photograph of al franken as if
you aren t allowed. if there s a protection order, domestic violence, you aren t allowed to get a gun. there have been breakdowns in the past. that s what happened to dylann roof. he shouldn t have been allowed. then one of the guns he got from a relative. it s a lot more complicated. as far as the mental health issue, in fitness, that regulation that he rolled back had to do with the social security administration being able to prohibit people from getting firearms if they had if they were on mental disability or if they had a third person who controlled their finances. the issue there was that if it was a due process issue and even the aclu, who is not exactly a fan of the nra s, even the aclu felt as though there were civil liberties violations based on that regulation because of the lack of due process. if you have anxiety and you have too much anxiety and you can t work, let s say and you get social security, then they said
chance to brief the administrator. unannounced to many at the epa and lobbyists have been lobbying to over turn their work, lobbying trump s epa transition team before scott pruitt was sworn in. it sounds like he had a friend at the add straigministr. without looking at the science and he says yes, we ll remove this. the premise of your question offends me. because? because i don t have a friend at epa. what i got is somebody that s following the damn law for the first time. that s not a friend. the issue was not a scientific issue. the issue was a due process issue. jean mccarthy disputes that and the clean water protection was based on science, decades of scientific research and years of
already been lobbying to overturn their work. lobbying trump s administration team before trump was sworn in. it sounds like you have a friend in the administrator. after a half hour without looking at the science he said yeah we re going to remove this so the premise of your question oerchds me? because? because-of-a present at e pa. what i got is somebody whose following the damn law for the first time. okay, that s not friend. and the issue was not a scientific issue, the issue was a due process issue. reporter: former e pa director disputes that. everything about bristol bay and the clean water protection was based on science she said. zek kads of science research. years of study. it is kwlie she officially approved the protection. like many at the e pa is stunned it all could be so easily undone