ducking it is a little extraordinary. well, not really. he was wherever he was, and it s up to the marshal service to find him and serve him in an appropriate way. so i don t know why that s an issue. it s not an issue legally unless he was really extending the purpose that s what i m here to talk about is the law. that s what i m here for. i understand, but this is he was served, he accepted service, and now that process is complete. right. he didn t make it easy, though. and it does sound like he s there s no law requirement that says he has to make it easy any more than a person in a civil suit has to or anyone else. the congress has the capability to find people and serve them properly according to the rules, and that s what they finally did. well, here s the constructive argument. the constructive argument is those who have nothing to hide comply. they don t try to duck service,
that says he has to make it easy any more than a person in a civil suit has to or anyone else. the congress has the capability to find people and serve them properly according to the rules, and that s what they finally did. well, here s the constructive argument. the constructive argument is those who have nothing to hide comply. they don t try to duck service, and they don t try to no. not work with congress. so what is your understanding in terms of whether your client is going to offer up documents and testimony? well, the president has asserted privilege over the documents that were conveyed to the archives after the end of the administration. so he ll be guided by whatever happens there. in terms of his own legal position, we re evaluating that. and as you pointed out, there are several issues here, not the least of which is privilege and not the least of which is whether this exercise by the committee pursuant to the recently enunciated standards of the supreme court