They will be moving out, and moving forward, its my understanding that its to be used, the 235,000 cost or the gap that mohcd has for developing housing, times that by the 150 and thats how we got the number. Commissioner richards okay. I wondered. Every single live work unit that was approved in San Francisco has an n. S. R. On it and saying its not housing, its commercial. And so academy put students in the housing pardon me in the buildings and considered it to be student housing, but they didnt comply with the law oliv on livework units. There were units that were abandoned, and there were more on harrison street. So they were not housing at that time because they were not conforming housing. That w they were both substantial buildings. President melgar thank you, miss hester. Mr. Adams, did you want to explain the methodology further . Dan adams, mohcd. Scott sanchez explanation was spot on. Commissioner richards we had a case here probably three or four units where essex trust le
Their doors whenever they feel. Dangerous economically and envir the city, horrible place. So i think as the supervisor sat should be way more. It should be at least commensurt theyve been illegally been getl these years that is way whata hundred times what the settleme. So i would urge you not to agrea settlement. If i were on the jury i would be rewards to the city. So why do we need to get the bee settlement. Take it to the court, get a jurn francisco residents to make a vd issue a penalty to them that woe than this. I dont think we need to settle. Thank you, next speaker, ple. Good evening, commissioners. Im with San Francisco land use. When i talk to fellow san francs that are plugged in and know wh, one thing that keeps coming up f Arts Universitys pension for gl estate. For me and most people i talk tt as a Real Estate Holding compan. Now, all the other things that w activists brought before you an, that, of course, i absolutely s. But one other thing that i woulo keep in mind i
And so academy put students in the housing pardon me in the buildings and considered it to be student housing, but they didnt comply with the law oliv on livework units. There were units that were abandoned, and there were more on harrison street. So they were not housing at that time because they were not conforming housing. That w they were both substantial buildings. President melgar thank you, miss hester. Mr. Adams, did you want to explain the methodology further . Dan adams, mohcd. Scott sanchez explanation was spot on. Commissioner richards we had a case here probably three or four units where essex trust legalized livework units, but at the time, livework was still livework. It was still illegal to use it as dwelling units or student housing, so what would that do to the units if we included bloxom. It would increase it by 33 numbers, which is the number in 575 harrison that theyre retaining. In regards to the livework issue, for this has been going on for a while, so for about
Their doors whenever they feel. Dangerous economically and envir the city, horrible place. So i think as the supervisor sat should be way more. It should be at least commensurt theyve been illegally been getl these years that is way whata hundred times what the settleme. So i would urge you not to agrea settlement. If i were on the jury i would be rewards to the city. So why do we need to get the bee settlement. Take it to the court, get a jurn francisco residents to make a vd issue a penalty to them that woe than this. I dont think we need to settle. Thank you, next speaker, ple. Good evening, commissioners. Im with San Francisco land use. When i talk to fellow san francs that are plugged in and know wh, one thing that keeps coming up f Arts Universitys pension for gl estate. For me and most people i talk tt as a Real Estate Holding compan. Now, all the other things that w activists brought before you an, that, of course, i absolutely s. But one other thing that i woulo keep in mind i
In when permits are due, and the way that we categorize is is by zip code. Makes it easy for enforcement. Off the top of my head, i dont know the exact date, but i would be more than happy to email it to any interested party. So perhaps this even february 15. February 15 is when this is up for renewal. Is there notifications for this renewal . Can you use the microphone, please. This is anna diaz. So how it works is we send a renewal letter a month prior to the notification dates, and again two weeks prior. And is the notification just to the permit holder . Like, how would the residents find out is my question. How would the residents find out if theres a renewal . They would not. But like, as we already mentioned, its revoked, so if anyone complains, it can be revoked. So less than a year from now, it will be up for renewal, so hopefully, those folks are here these folks that are here are marking it down, so anything that happens during that time can be noted in advance of renewal. T