followed by democrats in this case? no. one thing that comes out is impeachment requires certain periods of maturation that the public would have to catch up. if you rush this impeachment, you are going to leave half the country behind. that s not what the framers wanted. you have to give the time to build a record. this is not an impulse by item, you are trying to remove a dually elected president of the united states. that takes time and takes work. at the end, if you look at nixon which was the gold standard in this respect, the public did catch up. they did not support impeachment but they changed their mind. you changed their mind. so did the courts because you allow these issues to be heard in the courts. professor turley, the nixon/clinton impeachment were
matter, whether this merits removing the president from office. that is what this is designed to do. right? this isn t censure. this is not designed to go to the senate and die. this is about removing this president from office. over turning the 2016 election. it s not overturning the election. it doesn t impeachment does not overturn the election. that s the republican talking point. that is it is the removal of a dually elected president from office. and if you think it merits this, that is an argument we can have on its merits. why are you saying that committing a crime does not warrant at least a serious inquiry about whether or not that person should not be the president? we can debate. it most certainly does. that should be the grounds of the debate. we can debate the constitution more in seconds. steve, zerlina, noah, you guys are sticking around. excuse me. i just got something caught in my throat. and do not miss the latest episode of article two inside impeach
there has to be consequences. chris: all right, i want to play something that you said this week, here you are. this is a crime spree in progress, we have what the president did with the ukrainians and shakedown scheme of asking them to investigate his opponents. chris: congressman, the hardest evidence that s true. people will have to go to the internet to find out what we are talking about. the hardest evidence that you ve got is that the president conditioned a white house meeting, not military, a white house meeting on investigating the bidens, when it comes to actually holding up military aid all you ve got are presumptions, nobody who direct i will says that s what happened, does that rise to the level of what you call a crime spree and more important, does it rise to the level of ousting, removing a dually elected president of the united states? i m not going to decide, you know, ultimately on impeachment
recognize that is wrong and there has to be consequences. chris: all right, i want to play something that you said this week, here you are. this is a crime spree in progress, we have what the president did with the ukrainians and shakedown scheme of asking them to investigate his opponents. chris: congressman, the hardest evidence that s true. people will have to go to the internet to find out what we are talking about. the hardest evidence that you ve got is that the president conditioned a white house meeting, not military, a white house meeting on investigating the bidens, when it comes to actually holding up military aid all you ve got are presumptions, nobody who direct i will says that s what happened, does that rise to the level of what you call a crime spree and more important, does it rise to the level of ousting, removing a dually elected president of the united states? i m not going to decide, you know, ultimately on impeachment
there has to be consequences. chris: all right, i want to play something that you said this week, here you are. this is a crime spree in progress, we have what the president did with the ukrainians and shakedown scheme of asking them to investigate his opponents. chris: congressman, the hardest evidence that s true. people will have to go to the internet to find out what we are talking about. the hardest evidence that you ve got is that the president conditioned a white house meeting, not military, a white house meeting on investigating the bidens, when it comes to actually holding up military aid all you ve got are presumptions, nobody who direct i will says that s what happened, does that rise to the level of what you call a crime spree and more important, does it rise to the level of ousting, removing a dually elected president of the united states? i m not going to decide, you know, ultimately on impeachment