Critical to increase a little bit of the institution to be able to maintain the excellence and teaching capability of our institutions. So, i main focus now is making sure that we raise funds for scholarship, for grants, and making sure that we bring your kids and my kids also to a Great Institution that prepares them for a lifelong learning, lifelong job and lifelong citizenship in a great country. Provost, here is a tweet from one of our viewers, lauren, who says Virtual Schools will be one tenth the cost. Well, Virtual Schools are great for people who are very interested in that. But i believe sincerely in the residential experience for students. Its not i mean, its not only bringing the students here to study, but bringing students here to socialize, to create networks, to make friends, to meet people from all over the world. If you stay in your bedroom, thats very difficult, very, very difficult to produce what i call a whole citizen. We believe we produce Online Education for peo
Club member ken burns. Thank you all very much for coming. Im so happy to be back at the press club. Its really been a home base for our long arduous for the film. Urs exception. E i do feel compelled to edit. Was negative three years old back then. Though i was already working not yetlls, i had perfected what we call the ken effect quite then. I also feel, now that you war, that ihe civil reminded you 24 years ago, in the, when we came with civil war, that i reminded you felt aboutm sherman newspapers men. He hated newspapers men so much was sure if they killed them all, there would be news breakfast. Efore and, of course, unfortunately, unscathed withpe the rooseveltss roosevelts, thol eleanor, who held twice weekly News Conferences with first time a the first lady did that and franklin, because he had been an the harvard crimson, felt that had made him a newspapers man himself and loved to develop and cherish the development of personal relationships with the newspaper that he crowd
And markets are always looking for longterm signals. We just gave a very bill longterm signals that i believe in what i am hearing is opening the door to investments in the United States and that is a very good thing but people should also keep in mind and be converted by the fact that our climate decisions have been referred three times by the supreme court. There is no where else did go. They said move forward and that is what we are doing and so i think it is the strong a signal as we can possibly have, that the u. S. Is open to looking at how to devise a low carb and economy and get it moving and running in a way that will entice investment. That is good for everybody. Madam administrator, let me tell you we deeply appreciate your taking time with us and the work you are doing and if i get it right i would like to borrow an expression from your book, you did wicked good. Thank you. [applause] that is all right. The media at a going to have a little press availability right here. [i
÷nr emotions as wellni asjfnrnico a c5tqi u eres a bigni literatut thati ni okay. How about up here at theninini i c5tqi pdw3ni forth. Imni trying toninrcoca tnrokt,o i think what will happen, i mean, it does depend on how quickly people start to live longer and healthier lives, right . I mean, if it comes on really fast, people wont know what to do right away, and theyll keep following whatever patterns theyre following. You know, i think what it really means in the future is that were going to have a lot more diversity in relationships and in, you know, when people get married. I mean, even when its established that people can live to 150 in a healthy state, theres still going to be people who get married at 20 and then divorce at 25 and keep going, right . I mean, theyll just have more time to do that. But then theyll also be the people, i think probably a more general trend because what weve seen in the past is age of first marriage keeps going up. Instead of being 27, itll pop up
And looked, i believe, more closely and probingly at effectiveness and again concluded that the program came up short. But those two questions, what is the Legal Foundation and what is the effectiveness despite all of that structure i believe they never really got in 10 years of this program adequate attention. I want to take the prerogative of the chair to observe in response to senator whitehouses point that none of the oversight was adversarial in nature. Which is why i propose the constitutional advocates. Courts always do better when they hear both sides, the process is well served when there is contention as there was within this board. Might just point out that the dissent by ms. Brand says in commenting on whether the board should consider the legal question as you very thoughtfully observed and im quoting, this legal question will be resolved by the courts not by this board, which does not have the benefit of traditional adversarial legal briefing and is not particularly well