a cop or possible vigilanteism. what happened when these two guys met and who ended up feeling they were in danger of injury and therefore, drew the gun and used it? i think what i said was the legal question is at the moment that george zimmerman took the life of this teenager, was he reasonably in fear of great podly injury or death. that s the legal standard. that s such a difficult question to answer because you do have to take into account the entire condition text. here s a piece of evidence in this case. why do you have to take it in context? you re saying it differently this time. you ve changed the way you re saying it. i don t think i m saying it differently. why is it, if you said the question is his mind-set. was he danger he thought of great bodily injury or death. if he thought that at the time. reasonably fear. if he s right in his testimony, if he s right, his head was being pounded into the sidewalk. if it s true, was he within his
the box it came in, not all the racial history, the 450 years of bad history and all kinds of questions about police and our system and not the question whether this guy thought he was a cop or possible vigilanteism. what happened when these two guys met and who ended up feeling they were in danger of injury and therefore, drew the gun and used it? i think what i said was the legal question is at the moment that george zimmerman took the life of this teenager, was he reasonably in fear of great podly injury or death. that s the legal standard. that s such a difficult question to answer because you do have to take into account the entire condition text. here s a piece of evidence in this case. why do you have to take it in context? you re saying it differently this time. you ve changed the way you re saying it. i don t think i m saying it differently. why is it, if you said the question is his mind-set. was he danger he thought of great bodily injury or death.
system and not the question whether this guy thought he was a cop or possible vigilanteism. what happened when these two guys met and who ended up feeling they were in danger of injury and therefore, drew the gun and used it? i think what i said was the legal question is at the moment that george zimmerman took the life of this teenager, was he reasonably in fear of great podly injury or death. that s the legal standard. that s such a difficult question to answer because you do have to take into account the entire condition text. here s a piece of evidence in this case. why do you have to take it in context? you re saying it differently this time. you ve changed the way you re saying it. i don t think i m saying it differently. why is it, if you said the question is his mind-set. was he danger he thought of great bodily injury or death. if he thought that at the time. reasonably fear. if he s right in his testimony, if he s right, his head was being pounded into the sidewal
and i came out and i just like looked at him and said get the [ bleep ] out and at that time he drew a gun and when drew the gun i quick backed up into my office and shut the door. barricade the door and barricade the door. we heard initially shift jo shots and then we heard several shots which i understand was the cops coming in late. i felt like i was i got a text from my son saying i love you mom and worrying. that is when you know. amazing. officers heard the two shots as s.w.a.t. teams prepared to enter the office and police aren t releasing the gunman s name but they say that he died at the hospital. reaction from passengers aboard a florida plane where a man rushed the cockpit. check this out. yesterday police arrested a 24-year-old canadian man after he charged the cockpit door on an american airlines flight