this. understand law enforcement has kept it close to the vest. i have been told by people in the family. but that they have been very cooperative. they want answers and seeking those answers for a long time. they are very much grieving and mourning at this time. while they expected this to happen. i don t think that you can really prepare yourself for something like this. dr. drew clearly as sunny indicate they d would have taken toxicology drug test thousands, test ford drugs anded her for drugs and alcohol when she got to the hospital. for sure. want to say something about the missing teeth. a dramatic feature of this story. people need to know when there are resuscitations in the field. she was dead in the field. she had severe highbrain injury. they put tubes down. and doing so in the field they can knock teeth out. it happens they re doing everything father. and trying to save some one s life. just because teeth are missing doesn t mean he necessarily did it. she has been gon
bill cosby. the judge said why would he be embarrassed by giving his own account of what he did. i think this is vindication for two dozen women who said something similar happened to them. he can no longer continue to hide behind the denials the denials, the denials. dr. drew first let s talk about medically. quaaludes, what do they do to a person? very much like what the women describe. they cause, sud earnden intoxication sleep, and also causes a, let s call the a flopiness. people aren t sort of unable to propagate through the world. their muscles become so severely limp they almost can t lift their limbs up and come to their own defense. as you notice some of the women describe that kind of thing, consistent with quaaludes. does it make sense to you, dr. drew, if somebody s motivation for giving somebody s quaaludes is it to incapacitate them to be able to sexually assault them without their permission or without even asking? or is it some sort of interest
the national enquirer this i am not going to give into people who try to exploit me because of my celebrity status. cosby has never been criminally charged. for most accusations statute of limitations has run out. randi, appreciate it. attorney legal affairs commentator, and a medicine specialist, host of dr. drew on call. drew pinski? is this proof bill cosby is proof of what some of his many accusers said he did to them? absolutely. he makes an admission under oath. it is really important to put the context here. he was being deposed because he was being sued civilly by some one who said that he gave her a drug and then he raped her. and under this you know under oath statement he makes an admission. which is why when you look at his lawyer s argument about why the documents should not have come out. are really laughable. they said this would embarrass
him. sichl lar for civil lawsuits they have statute of limitations very few exceptions when you intentionally hide information. it is very difficult, and though this is all coming out now, we get an insight into sort of the psychopathy of what seems to be gathering evidence of a serial rapist it may be that he is only tried in the court of public opinion because there is not many courts that still have jurisdiction over him. could i just say this? go ahead, areva. i agree with mark. the importance of this is more women will be empowered to come forward, knowing he has gone on record and admitted he raped and drugged women. we may get some cases not barred by statute of limitations. dr. drew pinski areva. the undocumented immigrant accused of shooting and killing a woman in san francisco just been charged. donald trump doubling down on his remarks many found offensive. he issued a new statement on the killing. appears to be trying to make a political point about what happened. a
on. my pleasure. back with dr. drew pinski and o mara. dr. drew, what do you make of what patty has just said? well it is breathtaking when you hear her state the allegations and lay it out the way she has. she could be right. that is certainly a possibility. if if what she is saying is accurate she will be proven to be right. i found it interesting that she had only two sips of the grand marnier with the quaaludes allegedly in it. she may have forgotten what happened after the initial dose. people s memory gets erased moving forward. she may have eventually drunk more than she remembers. but in any case even to have induced that degree of memory problem that quickly suggests that he put rather high concentrations, potentially dangerous concentrations you. can easily overdose on a quaalude. not a safe medication. i m surprised somebody wasn t really hurt. areva, you point out in the lawsuit the plaintiff s legal