process crimes are still crimes. and beyond that, why are you lying? why are you committing a felony? what are you trying to hide? again, if this happens with one person, maybe they re trying to help themselves. but when it happens with six people and you continue to see this pattern, it starts to become easier to start drawing lines through something and we will have to wait to see from robert mueller, how does this tie together and more importantly what does he openly do with that. thank you. good to have all of you with us. coming up, the art of the cake. after 35 days of people going to sleeping in cars and not paying their bills, end can the government shutdown, the same deal the president could have had more than a month ago. was it worth all of the heartache? ( ) so, every day, we put our latest technology and vast expertise to work.
convince them. she will meet with this group of rebels and try to lay out her case as to why she should remain in power. why it is a risk to remove her and begin a leadership challenge here and of course those vote follows. we ll know the results at 4:00 p.m. eastern time. kelly, thank you very much for that. we ll stay on that story. it has been 25 years this year since justice joined this court. a kwater century since her confirmation hearings in 1993. drawing lines on the basis of gender is in almost all cases impermissible. i think generally in our society a change is incrimental and during change it happens one
opening to go down that road? today s news shows that the president and his associates were willing to lie or mislead the country about the nature of their financial interest in russia. i think that tells us one thing. it tells us we can t rely on what they re telling us. there have been credible allegations and statements by the president s sons about how much money they re getting from russia or don t need u.s. banks because they get money from russia and there are other indicia of money laundering that raise this serious concern which i think someone needs to look into. it would be my hope that bob mueller is investigating this but i don t know that that s the case and the president has certainly tried to draw a red line, tell the special counsel and justice department you can t cross this line, maybe they made a decision they wouldn t cross that line, but i don t think it is his position as president to be drawing lines and i certainly don t think when the national security of th
of invaders that politicians using to jen up fear. shut up about drawing lines. this rhetoric exists. this man said this thing and now this thing happened. stop it. look in the mirror and calm down. at some point, there was a huge leap that was not based on logic. shepard: you turn up the crazies and the crazies come out. even though we all love social media. shepard: we don t. we are on the same page. the key is that people can find each other and inspire each other and validate that anomy, that normlessness where they feel emboldened to act on something that a few days ago received inconceivable.
drawing lines around roger stone. you go with the circles and start from the outside and then you work your way in and we know that roger stone has not been interviewed by the special counsel which may mean this that he s a target. seems to me. he has said publicly he expects at some point to be indicted i guess. maybe we ought to take him at his word. we know that the president and you know this, jim, continued to talk to roger stone even after he was no longer officially or even unofficially with the campaign. they remained friends. trump doesn t let anybody go. does that with a lot of people. yeah. exactly. roger stone is a person that he s known for decades. and i think they spoke all the time. so, it s not surprising that they re talking to everybody roger stone was dealing with.