corporations. we ve seen reaction from leading corporations- corporations. yes, on these communiques corporations. yes, on these communiques it corporations. yes, on these communiques it is - corporations. yes, on these communiques it is really - corporations. yes, on these i communiques it is really about looking at the nuance of the language, and this communique, we think this is probably the fifth draught of the communique and hasn t yet been actually finalised. it could even be tweaked in the next hour or two. what we think it is saying is that the g20 leaders will undertake meaningful and effective actions to pursue efforts to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees. remember, at 1.5 degrees target above preindustrial levels is the kind of key figure here, because the scientific consensus is that if we go beyond global warming 1.5 degrees, and at the moment the world is not on track at all to meet 1.5 degrees, then we could be seeing much, much more of that extreme weather, the
greener economy. so plenty to talk about for the second day of talks as well. and plenty to talk about with an expert on the 620. we are joined now by professorjohn curtin. very nice to see you. thank you for sparing the time. they communicate so far, the draught, looks fairly weak, i suppose, so far, the draught, looks fairly weak, isuppose, on so far, the draught, looks fairly weak, i suppose, on the climate issue. they are waiting perhaps to see what will happen in the glasgow talks after this. what sort of stage are we out, do you think, of a 620? is it a stage you would expect by now, or would you expect things to have gone further? i now, or would you expect things to have gone further? have gone further? i would have exected have gone further? i would have exnected much have gone further? i would have expected much more. have gone further? i would have expected much more. this - have gone further? i would have expected much more. this is - have gone further? i would have ex
very real for people. tom s rule about small very real for people. tom s rule about small drops very real for people. tom s rule about small drops of very real for people. tom s rule about small drops of alcohol. very real for people. tom s rule - about small drops of alcohol savings getting large amounts of press coverage is illustrated on ourfinal paper. the metro, borisjohnson and rishi sunak in a brewery in southeast london. cheers, richie beer and champagne will probably be cheaper, madeira, portand beer and champagne will probably be cheaper, madeira, port and other fortified spirits will be more expensive. if you drink madeira, will you be sipping it to save your supply? i will you be sipping it to save your su -l ? ., ~ will you be sipping it to save your su l? ., ~ ., will you be sipping it to save your su l? ~ ., supply? i don t drink madeira, i m sor , supply? i don t drink madeira, i m sorry. i m supply? i don t drink madeira, i m sorry. i m a supply? i
WINTER: How can the weather people predict what's going to happen months from now when they can't always even gets tomorrow's forecast right? It's a very good question.