Abstract principles but the actual existence of the incredibly free and open society the last to explain to be influenced and changed and improved provided these hideous are grounded in american idea of free society. They want to have that whole not just the abstract principles are what weve made of them in the present but the combination the makes possible and the most open. So we still can integrate immigrants but we dont really try to so we try to teachers also to teach see outsiders what American Life is about we have a terrible failure of assimilation in our country but if we can address that we dont have to be any less of a nation of immigrants. I dont know if burke would have thought that but that is what i think. Host they give for doing this. I hope you enjoyed it. Of great debate. Guest thank you very much. This is john nichols and Robert Mcchesney. We are here under the Global Voices author series sponsored by the International House of the university of chicago. For those a
I justices on the Supreme Court including chief Justice Robert thought requiring people to engage in Economic Activity or commerce in order that it can be regulated was beyond the powers of congress. Therefore, the individual mandate is unconstitutional and the reason he was unable to uphold the Affordable Care act with his view that do this ceiling construction which he changed mandate into an option to either pay a tax combat pay the penalty which he construed as a tax or buy insurance, but you are no longer required to buy insurance because i was unconstitutional, just like we argued. Host randy barnett, if someone reads a restoring the lost consultation, do they have to be a law scholar . Guest i hope not. It was for a general lay audience i have people who fret at more than one third event of gifts to others because it really opens their eyes about what is missing in the constitution and how it came to be. It is a serious book. It is not superlight, although i try to be lighter th
First permit in the matter will go before the South Dakota Supreme Court Written By: Marcus Traxler | ×
The land of John Millan and Kenneth Hostler is displayed on the monitor at the front of the room during a Davison County Drainage Commission meeting April 20, 2021 at the Davison County North Offices in Mitchell. Millan and Hostler have been on opposite sides of a fight over a drainage permit between Mitchell and Mount Vernon. (Marcus Traxler / Republic)
For a third time, Davison County on Tuesday approved a controversial drainage permit application, which has already been entangled in a year-long court battle upon prior approvals.