justification for asserting that borisjohnson deliberately misled the house. we boris johnson deliberately misled the house. ~ ., boris johnson deliberately misled the house. ~ . ., ., ., the house. we are waiting to hear what boris the house. we are waiting to hear what boris johnson s the house. we are waiting to hear what boris johnson s response - the house. we are waiting to hearj what boris johnson s response will what borisjohnson s response will be. he has promised that it will be a hearty one. looking back to when he stepped down as a tory mp, he had been given advance site of this report, sojust been given advance site of this report, so just talk us through what we have heard from borisjohnson already. if we have heard from boris johnson alread . , ., ., we have heard from boris johnson alread . ., , already. if you give me a second, i will be able already. if you give me a second, i will be able to already. if you give me a second, i will be able to give already.
them a draft copy of planned new legislation to clamp down on gambling. the mps code of conduct as specifically prevent any questions being asked in the houses of parliament other than for parliamentary reasons. scott benton has said that after this interaction he suspected that what he was being asked to do was not within the rules and didn t have any further contact with the company. it doesn t appear that any explicit rules have been broken in practice. however, the conservative chief whip, simon hart, in charge of party discipline, said he has referred himself to the parliamentary standards commissioner. he has been suspended from the conservative party while that investigation is ongoing. while it does seem like no rules have been broken in practice, this whole incident has raised fresh questions, after the tory mp 0wen paterson was suspended last year for breaching lobbying rules, about whether mps
that long before the leak of that draft opinion, security protocols when it came to documents at the supreme court were very lax. now, that could have led to the leak or at the very least, it hindered the investigation into the league. for example, several of the justices over the years, sometimes that i would put sensitive information into personal emails. information belonged on secure servers, and the person who told me this wasn t suggesting that it meant a justice had leaked a draft copy of an opinion but at the very least it showed that the justices themselves weren t setting a good example to the chambers, to their employees about how to deal with sensitive documents. another issue concerned so-called burn bags. these are bags where you put sensitive information thapd re later burned or shredded. at the supreme court, they re taking down to the basement, put in a locked bin, and later picked up by a shredding company. the source tells me the problem with this is there s no unifo
fly at half that height. they put this in place at three airports along the coast. those airports were paralyzed for about an hour as the shoot-down took place. it wasn t long after that all of these restrictions were lifted, although, this will likely go down in history as one of the largest pieces of restricted airspace ever. we have never seen something like this put into place, and the faa says it was all at the request of the pentagon. pete muntean, pentagon, cnn, washington. united states supreme court was rocked to its core last year when someone leaked a draft copy of a court opinion overturning the landmark roe versus wade decision. now sources are telling cnn about other previously reported unsecured lapses by justices and court employees. we have the exclusive report. reporter: cnn has learned
directly from his mouth from his intent. will: to your point questions regarding relationship to democrats and it regulators. he was openly lobbying his potential regulators there are questions about his relationship with the ftc chairman. there are so many questions that need the sunlight of transparency. and now, i don t know that we will get that sunlight. steve: because they were embarrassing questions and each worse answers for the people that you detailed. rioters apparently got a draft copy of what he was going to say today, this morning on capitol hill. of course, he is not going to be addressing them. but, apparently, this is the exact first line. i would like to start by formally stating under oath i fd. up and then he was going to blame his lawyers and the new ceo which todd just quoted.