derangement syndrome. it s not surprising that it was asked but i think it s the wrong direction to go to get answers on where we re headed on this. julian, even before that moment of policy, there was this image at the white house standing and pointing to the president when she told everyone later all roads lead to putin. the house speaker made it very clear how she was leading her caucus with serious caution on impeachment, but now she says full steam ahead. draft articles of impeachment. why is she so confident in this move now? well, the first thing she did was to round up enough votes informally to make sure that she could do this. when she focused on ukraine, she understood that she had the support of almost the entire caucus, including the moderates who were very ambivalent about it. once she does that, her style is to move forward with full force and vigor. and she understands what this all means. she understands that the only way really to counteract the
they re being drafted as we speak and i think we will see draft articles of impeachment any day now. and you ll be back in a week and we ll put those theories to the test to see if impeachment articles have happened. you can ask your own questions on cross-exam. a health care for justice ruth bader ginsburg. we ll have an update on her condition next. first, this week s global energy challenge. this is the world s first commercial carbon capture machine. the long-term plan is to store co2 in underground rock formations. but in the meantime, they ve found another use from the captured carbon with coca-cola
have to be involved do draft articles of impeachment. so democrats are trying to stay narrowly focused, move quickly, but also be as thorough as possible. it is a challenging task up against really about 30 working days left in the year for the u.s. congress. not a lot of time to get this and literally anything else done. nancy, as you well know, senior white house staff gave mick mulvaney a round of applause at this morning s staff meeting. but you ve been reporting that in the past week, white house aides have felt under siege. that s got to only increase with this new reporting. nancy? okay. so we re having audio problems. so if we can, we will go back to her. but danny sovalos is here with me and carole lamb as well to talk about the legal aspects of this. so, danny, i m very curious to hear what you think about heidi
behind. this is exactly what you would expect. we need to debate health care, foreign policy, immigration. they will have an opportunity to present their case to the american public. and you will see the polls tighten, no doubt. tee up a conversation for us here in new york. the house judiciary committee. it seems like it is the intelligence committee taking the lead here. what is the role of the judiciary committee here while all of this is unfolding, as this becomes or seems to be very narrowly focused investigation. draft articles article of impeachment. first of all, let s remember no one is above the law. the job of congress is oversight, investigation, making sure there s transparency in government. we are co-qualls to the presidency, to the executive
being uncomfortable on camera about the path this is going? i don t have a problem with people having an argument with words. we into the word fight today by calling it what it is, in impeachment investigation and what we see is when we use the term investigation we will have more members understanding we are doing our job. you can t draft articles of ? we perceive in 1974, the senate held hearing for 9 months, i m not insisting that will be the case until the smoking gun was found. in impeachment investigation allows us to have greater authority in the courts to rebut some of the arguments made by the white house to keep mcgann from testifying or keep other