moved by parry i love you about my other she wants to marry you mike was. the best i d like to have him as a son am the child of immigrants as the fan favorite that something new for aberdeen is which is a fast enough the right wing nationalists who prey on finn is caused by the town s high unemployment rate but amid all the euphoria there are just a few who are willing to voice their complaints about the ethnic makeup of the winning team. but fisher i m not especially excited now i m french that it could be the french team they re almost all black. that both as you were used to everything. just a two hour drive away from a view of the bania of paris where many players on the a keep trickle or come from . many immigrant families live in the suburbs.
you think and when republicans were back in the majority, they lowered the vote threshold to 51 votes for supreme court justices as well. let s bring in phil manningly. do you know if mcconnell is even considering listening to schumer to wait until after the election. i appreciate your chuckle. the short answer is no. he made that statement on the senate floor a short while ago saying there will be a vote in the fall and they expect to have hearings after a selection is made and it is worth noting, the senate majority leader is high on the 25 individuals that are on president trump s list that he said he would pick from. most interesting from the republican side of things in terms of what will happen next, i have one top republican official tell me the full machinery of the republican party is about to kick into high gear. this is obviously an issue of utmost importance for the majority leader and the parry. we re talking millions of dollars in outside money and major pushes on the p
secure the border. all day long the american people are going to side with the parry that wants to secure the border. not 55-45 or 60-40, 70-30, 80-20, i m talking 90-10 on that. in the trump administration political view, in their strategic world view, anybody who complains about this policy or expresses outrage or hurt about the policy is exposing themself as a wus and what the american people will vote for at the ballot box is harshness toward immigrants and they want it to be seen as unconscionably harsh. the more the better because the more outrage and protest they stir up, the more strongly anti-immigrant they will be seen. and they think that is the best political issue they ve got bar none. washington post white house reporter philip rucker told nickal wallace that he visited the white house today and he was able to see their delight over all of the outrage that has been
is trying to pull off here. it is not that they didn t know it would create outrage to start ripping 2-year-olds away from parents. it is not like they are trying to assuage people s concerns about the policy. there is a reason the president went out of his way today to deliberately describe immigrants as an infestation in this country. they infest our country he said today. white house knows what that means. white house adviser steven miller explained to the new york times how much the trump administration loves the outrage over this. how much they are in fact banking on it. how, in fact, that is the point of what they are doing. steven miller telling the times, you have one party in favor of open borders and you have one party that wants to secure the border. all day long the american people are going to side with the parry that wants to secure the border. not 55-45 or 60-40, 70-30, 80-20, i m talking 90-10 on that.
we saw the march for our lives give the democrats a nice template for how to build a movement. you need a cross section and nobody can be in silo and just talking about their one pet issue. you re not just talking about reproductive rights but reproductive justice and tieing it to income inequality and race. if you are trying the issues together, you could build a full coalition of people that could go and win at the polls. but if democrats are just looking for the bright shiny star that is going to save the parry, that will be the wrong direction. let s talk about daca. the president in those tweets i ve been i trying to get to the bottom of this. is somebody prepping him on policy or getting the policy and understands it and lying about it or just not understand the policy. i can t figure out which one is worse. so my sense of this is that he wants to get across the idea that he is not responsible for the condition of the daca recipients now. that it was up to democrats and rep