progress of emotion putting florida as the center of the political universe. the stormy daniels hush money investigation entering a new dangerous phase for donald trump? also, tonight, a series of politically motivated shootings in arizona shows us how there is a new era of fuel political violence in america. the new york times. investigation into how the new york restaurants are keeping minimum wages down. this, is american voices. but a weekend of protests over abortion access is once again shining a light over the battle of reproductive rights. it is a battle likely to shape american politics for years to come, it will be a key issue as we begin to talk about 2024. tomorrow, vice president kamala harris will mark the 50th anniversary of roe v. wade in florida. this, of course, is the first anniversary of the first 1973 ruling since the supreme court reversed it. harris is expected to lay out how the white house fights these restrictions on state level. there is a reason
to be able to handle those, so they called in the white house special counsel. really, all of, as this new discovery, really adding to a list of, a lengthy list of questions we already had for this white house. questions that deserve answers, not only for the media, but tyler, i just want to zoom out for a second because we have breaking news that can be very easy to jump in, and for us to go to the details and our next questions. for those who are watching, i think the context of how we got here matters. yeah, that s a great question. i think it all starts in early november when president biden s personal attorney with the washington post that identified him as path for. they searched the penn biden center, he was clearly vacating that off as the president biden, or than former president biden had used as his personal office on occasion, and in downtown washington building. he was packing it out, vacating that. he came across these classified documents. illegally reported them
been sddescribed as the dark moy atm of the right, a koch brothers affiliated organization. back in 2002 it got $5,000. no big deal. by 2019, when this operation was in full swing, it got $7 million. we don t know who the real donor was because that s the job of donor s trust is to deidentify the donor. to launder the identity off the donation so you can t connect the dots any longer. but $7 million, i think, is quite a lot of money. and unfortunately, the federalist society was not alone. right down the hallway is something called the judicial crisis network. its office is on the same hallway as the federalist society in the downtown washington building. although the website and tax filings list a mailing address at a different location. an address shared by multiple companies. and right down that hallway, at that judicial crisis network,
atm of the right, the koch brothers affiliated operation, in 2002 it got $5. no big deal. 2019, in this operation was in full swing, it got $7 million. we don t know who the real donor was because that s the job of donors trust is to deidentify the donor. to launder the identity off the donation so you can t connect the dots anymore. but $7 million i think is quite a lot of money. and unfortunately, the federalist society was not alone. right down the hallway, is something called the jude it s crisis network. it s in the downtown washington building. although jcn s mailing address at a different location and address shared by multiple companies. and right down that hallway, at that jude it s crisis network,
0 of marriage, correct? i am aware there are various religious faiths that define marriage in a traditional way. do you see that when the supreme court makes a dramatic pronouncement about the invalidity about state marriage laws, it will inevitably set in conflict between those who ascribe to the supreme court s edict and those who have a firmly held religious belief that marriage is between a man and a woman? well, senator, these issues are being litigated, as you know, throughout the courts i as people raise issues and so, i m limited in what i can say about them. i m aware there are cases i m not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide in the future. i m asking isn t it apparent that when the supreme court decided something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme court s edict, particularly in an area where people have sincerely held religious believes, doesn t that effec