applicants to them to say these are people that can do what you need them to do and really create an effective synergy there. as i said, i think that conversation is beginning, because we do not know necessarily the what before we can describe the how. but it is certainly top of mind. supervisor campos: on the youth involved a plan, my understanding is that they will play a role in that. we had a very good agreement. they do call out dcyf. they have a great number of youth programs that should be related to this, especially related to the water. we had a very good meeting with the general manager of recreation and park, high demand goes up to talk about the issues to say what is the inventory of the things we see here in san francisco that could be leveraged. when the event authority, which has already had exciting discussions about the sailing in the u.s. involvement piece of sailing can enhance both directions. i think it is a starting point. i think there is a lot of wor
community housing organizations. there are significant affordable housing implications of this development. we are very pleased in general of the notion of seeing the possibility of rental construction happening west of the boulevard. a wearty in this town. it is inconceivable for me to figure out how we go forward on a complex question of guaranteeing continued rent control in the legal era that has been laid out to you very briefly. and then understand that this is all going to be handled by a development agreement which we have some small understanding of. i would hope this commission would want to understand how a development agreement works. what are its terms? how long is it in place? is it in place, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years? how is it the represent control issue is dealt in the development agreement. think that is of significant importance, not simply of this project but as a city wide issue as well. i would strongly urge you to take due deliberation of this proces
ownership. but i will also say the schedule that i outlined a few minutes ago is one that we now feel comfortable with, because we have been working fairly extensively with several city agencies, all of whom have to be volumed in this because there will be a number of public streets running through the site, public utilities, all of those issues and you will see a development agreement we have been heavily involved with. we have gotten to the point where we are comfortable bringing this project to you on that code just like any project. i recognize it as a big project and clearly there has been a lot of community outreach by the developer. but we are to the point we feel comfortable bringing it to you in that schedule. that s why i mentioned the dates that i did. president miguel: vice president olague? vice president olague: and, again, i don t like to usually i prefer to be discrete about some of these issued that come up. but what occurred is i sat in a meeting on monday
are considering, the e.i.r. process. it s singularly different than processes undertaken by the department, i think, since this is a single developer-driven project. even though it s a large area, it isn t as though the department were the ones that staff went out and conducted public meetings, and got public input and tried to craft a plan that met the needs of the community, so to speak. so i don t see why there s a big hurry here. even the schedule that s been put out seems to be somewhat contracted process. and i don t know if the department has had an opportunity to go out and conduct its own community meetings out there, based on what the developer has put forth or not. if not, i think that kind of time should be allowed as part of the planning process for this area. so even though what commissioner olague said in terms of the original proposals has now been extended out, i still think it s too short. president miguel: commissioner antonini? commissioner antonini: i am