would pay instead of, you know, spreading wealth based on need. money woulneedd be allocated to individuals purely based on the issue of race. racnow, the premise, according to the left, would be to compensate for the evils oflavey slavery. now, first, the country billn simply cannot afford the billions and billions of dollars and trillion s of dollars that it would likely take to allocate and ultimatelyn ,i t is a punitive measure and one that will even furthervi dividede a country thaty deep is already deeply divided. those who support reparationly o believe that america is an evile country filled to the brim with generous notions of bad people. and while no intelligent perso n ,let me be clear, deniese the evils of slavery, it wouldnl be a great injustice to ignore all the progress this country has made on racial issues and other issues. which is the beauty o our great constitution. it has provide d all of us a roadmap that we can right wrongs and correct injustices. o
ng we ve made a lot of progress. we still have a long way to go ,though.mmet but nryo doubt reparations is an extreme policy based on divisive racial politics. and if you think that it is a y far fetched pipe dream, you betterer think think again m common sense in america is nowin becoming a thing in the past thc common sense, i could say,ou for maybe half the country is pretty much dead. and now democrats in congress, they are planning a 14 listeners, not a million, not a 40 n trillion dollar reparations plan. watch this. our country was not founded on the principle that all people are created equal. the media focuses on this one kidnap person, usually white. the u.s. stole 12 millionople people. yes, this is an opportunity for congress to confront our nation s racist history of slavery, white supremacyp reme d