there are shareties but we have not fully vetted them. when you have something of this nature, people come out of the woodwork and say all kinds of things. we have an ethical responsibility to make sure that we cross our t.s and dot our is before we start trodding out allegations against mr. cohen or the president. a couple more questions. do you know, if any, of these eight women who have come to you have come forward to you also signed confidentiality or hush agreements? we understand that two of them have. let s get back to our analysts. what do you think? if this is true, that s potentially another huge headache for the president and michael cohen? this whole case say huge headache, whether it s this alleged defamation count that has just been added to the indictment, whether or not they re behind the threat in the parking lot, her credibility which seem to me as an observer of witnesses to be pretty good.
mcgann and going in as white house legal counsel and building this team you think from a laurie perspective, we need to make sure we are doubly transparent about everything related to russia. we need to cross our ts and dot our is. if it looks like we re hiding something that will make everything so much worse. it is clear they did not go through the steps. unless your version of draining the swamp is not being forthcoming on forms on everyone who comes into the united states government are required to fill out. the interesting question as kushner provides documents with the staff general flynn provided documents, we assume that will lead eventually to some meetings with the staff. jeff sessions still a big question mark, public or private. one part of comey s testimony if you listen to it comes out quite favorable to the president, this is a question from marco rubio. in essence the president agreed with your statement it would be great if we could have an investigation, all the f