censorship by surrogate by proxy. ozen you have dozens of fbi agentss f who supposedly are tasked to go through social media. you have one hundred and fifty contacts with just one twitter executive giving lists of users that should be be banned, including satiricalba sites. there s very little runway left for the fbi to continue to deny that there isn tto a serious problem here. people, i think, largely agreepe . i hope that while the firstt apl amendment applies to theie government, it also applies to agents of the government. so i -f the fbi uses a proxy, o uses an agent like twitter, it s still censorship. sti it s stillll a a violation of the first amendment. heat s interesting here, too, and i think that americans are frustrated because with the fbi, they seem, whether it is the russian dossier hoax, , some argueerence
poop. that s my dream. this is the same jim baker the former counsel of the fbi who helped push the steele dossier hoax. jim comey s legal counsel. but if you listen to the media you think elon just laid off a 68 year old legally blind blue haired cleaning lady with a prosthetic lunge and stage three lung cancer. get out of here kerr trued and take your oxygen tank with you. it s true. now, musk is suspicious that baker scrubbed the twitter files before matt taibbi unveiled them friday keeping the fbi s name out of everything. you have to wonder how a former fbi is your censor like having a fox to your chicken coop head count. so musk is like our ears, finally somebody not just talking about free speech but defending it. once again it s all about trans patterns something our media hates more than our president does diaper rash. and while the media is busy
they communicate what they found is privileged toward. a special master is essential. tammy: you think this is what people want. they are doing everything that flies in the face of that. why not have a special master? so people like me can say that s fair. it s the same fbi unit that was doing the russia dossier hoax. they don t care. do you think the judge will appoint a special master? how does that affect how we proceed from here? well, she wanted to write a careful decision. she is inclined i think to appoint a special master. she posed the question: what is
why are they embracing it? because they have lost at every point until now. and as you said, they have been focused on impeachment since 2016. tammy: and lee, congratulations on your book. we are seeing here at the same time ranging from the russia dossier hoax to this, there s a not just the sloppiness to what s been done, but people who expect not to be found out but, most of all, they also expect it to be, you know, backed up by media. they have worked with media through this procedure. tell us what you think because we have got so many people hearsay and gossip and relied on newspaper stories. what s your take on that element? well, i think what you were saying before about the start of the before the election is absolutely correct in my book i have different sources who show documents and sources show this began in march of 2016. and you saw before the election you saw a
pole. why are they embracing it? because they have lost at every point until now. and as you said, they have been focused on impeachment since 2016. tammy: and lee, congratulations on your book. we are seeing here at the same time ranging from the russia dossier hoax to this, there s a not just the sloppiness to what s been done, but people who expect not to be found out but, most of all, they also expect it to be, you know, backed up by media. they have worked with media through this procedure. tell us what you think because we have got so many people hearsay and gossip and relied on newspaper stories. what s your take on that element? well, i think what you were saying before about the start of the before the election is absolutely correct in my book i have different sources who show documents and sources show this began in march of 2016. and you saw before the election you saw a