Be one of those pillars that stands up for our democracy in those brutal, harsh moments. Thank you for sharing with us. Thank you vgood morning. Thank you all for coming. Thank you for coming. Did i. I think im on my way there, but i. There the United States has produced two extraordinary, influential major architects, both named frank. This is not frank lloyd wright. This is the other one i didnt meet frank lloyd wright. I wanted to, but i in im sure you all know that frank won the pritzker prize for architecture which is the the award of the of the design. Well that was in 1989 before you were born. Theres evelyn de broad. And just to just to set i, i want to read to you the citation that was written at that time. Its very short. So only seven sentences. But i need to set the stage a little bit before i read it. In 1989, the and i should also preface this by saying im not an architecture critic nor an art architecture historian, so i may get some. Oh, well, im going to leave. For abo
Be one of those pillars that stands up for our democracy in those brutal, harsh moments. Thank you for sharing with us. Thank you vergood morning. Thank you all for coming. Thank you for coming. Did i. I think im on my way there, but i. There the United States has produced two extraordinary, influential major architects, both named frank. This is not frank lloyd wright. This is the other one i didnt meet frank lloyd wright. I wanted to, but i in im sure you all know that frank won the pritzker prize for architecture which is the the award of the of the design. Well that was in 1989 before you were born. Theres evelyn de broad. And just to just to set i, i want to read to you the citation that was written at that time. Its very short. So only seven sentences. But i need to set the stage a little bit before i read it. In 1989, the and i should also preface this by saying im not an architecture critic nor an art architecture historian, so i may get some. Oh, well, im going to leave. For a
I think im on my way there, but i. ■y8there the United States has produced two extraordinary, influential major architects, both namedthis is not frank llt meet frank lloyd wright. I wanto, i in im sure you all know thaht frank won te pritzker prize for architecture which is the the award of the of theesign. Well that was in 1989 before you weren. Theres evelyn de■ broad. D ju i, i want to read to you the citation that was written at that time. Its very s only seven sentence. But i need to set the stage a little bit before i read it. In 1989, the and i should also preface this byim not an architecture critic nor an art architecture may get some. Oh, well, im going to leave. For about ten yearse pritzker prize was announced, the architecture profession, i say, was in some esthetic turmoil. Exhibition that had been mounted at the Museum Modern Art in 1979 by arthur drexle c transformation gardens in modern architecture. It was controversial, partly because ex for a very long times th
Is it Something Else . Taking things that speak to you. Rose whats the object lesson here . Its a really Emotional Experience for them. Rose tell me the significance of the moment. Rose mildred and richard loving didnt start out to change the law of the land. They simply wanted to be married. The arrest of the interracial couple ended with a Historic Supreme Court ruling, and their story is told in the film loving. The film was written and directed by jeff nichols, golden globe nominee, ruth nedprks a, plays Mildred Loving and nick control plays the couples attorney. You want to try to find their essence and you want to try to represent that truthfully. And i do not think they had an agenda. I think its very important to the way the story plays out in the film, and i think its really important to their story overall, which is the act of them getting married was not an act of defiance. It wasnt a symbol or a statement that they were trying to make. They just truly loved one another. And
Is it Something Else . Taking things that speak to you. Rose whats the object lesson here . Its a really Emotional Experience for them. Rose tell me the significance of the moment. Rose mildred and richard loving didnt start out to change the law of the land. They simply wanted to be married. The arrest of the interracial couple ended with a Historic Supreme Court ruling, and their story is told in the film loving. The film was written and directed by jeff nichols, golden globe nominee, ruth nedprks a, plays Mildred Loving and nick control plays the couples attorney. You want to try to find their essence and you want to try to represent that truthfully. And i do not think they had an agenda. I think its very important to the way the story plays out in the film, and i think its really important to their story overall, which is the act of them getting married was not an act of defiance. It wasnt a symbol or a statement that they were trying to make. They just truly loved one another. And