first one to mention mma style. you know about this witness. can t help you. don t do it. don t even try. fortunately even the fbi couldn t help us out with that voice so now it is sort of up to you on that. doris singleton. initial activity with him, with the interview. i think what was significant about that was george zimmerman s response to the christian issue and to the fact that she was the first person to tell him that trayvon martin had passed away and the statements are what the statements are. chris serino what he stated was in his opinion again, he is the law enforcement officer in charge of the investigation dr there are no consistent inconsistencies in what he heard from george zimmerman. there were some? yes. were they significant in his mind as to what that they
nakasone said can t help you, don t do it, don t even try. fortunately, even the fbi couldn t help us out with that voice, so now it is sort of up to you on that. dora singleton doris singleton, initial activity with the interview, and i think what was significant about that was george zimmerman s response to the christian issue and to the fact that she was the first person to tell him that trayvon martin had passed away. and the statements are what the statements are. chriser is reno, again, what he stated was in his opinion and, again, he s a law enforcement officer in charge of the investigation, that will weren t any significant inconsistencies in what he heard from george zimmerman. were there some? yes. were they significant in his mind as to what that they were lies? no. not even when he did the
0 dr. bao, that was the state s decision to bring him before you as a medical examiner. not really their decision. he was the one who did the autopsy. so although there was some interaction there that might have best been just redone, the reality is the only injuries were the injuries that we know about on trayvon martin and that the wet clothes should not have been should not have been bagged in paper and that the hands should have been bagged and we will talk about the hands in a little bit. this witness told you that it was her son as i m sure you expected before she ever got on the stand. mrs. zimmerman. mesa, sitting at a computer and listening and hearing in the background the voice he knew without question and immediately to be that of his nephew george zimmerman. i think he came across very credibly. i think he came across of his oath and of his word and i will ask you to consider the testimony in that regard. mark osterman a buddy of his and talked about the weapon use and h
0 i think he came across a man of his oath, of his word, and i would ask you to consider the testimony in that regard. mark osterman, buddy of his, talked about the weapon used, how you holster a gun. he s good at what he does. he was helping george figure out how to fire a gun. son da osterman, friend, definitely george zimmerman screaming for help. and explained away some of what the state was trying to prove ty call about the anger and hatred and all that that just isn t there. same thing with ms. geri russo, same thing with leanne benjamin, that was george zimmerman. john donnelly was interesting because i m not sure that i could if i had thought about trying to figure out who in the vietnam wants to come before people that break down with it, but i think that his testimony was quite credible when he believed it was mr. zimmerman. doris singleton and, by the way, chris serino both say the same thing. unfortunately, when mr. martin did first hear the tape, he said what he believed t
prosecutors interrogating zimmerman. one is sean hannity. they used him essentially to question george zimmerman and point out things he said that seems absurd. sort of use that to paint him as generally a liar, but the piece of video i thought he used a bit, was the interview with chris is a runno and doris singleton. in that interview it was asked the most obvious question, number one you were scared of a person. you had a gun, did you reach for your gun? do you go around a dark corner knowing you re armed with your gun in your holster? i ve never understood wood the prosecution didn t try to explore that more, where was the gun? how did the fight take place? did he see it at all? i was surprised they never explored that or created a theory. hold it there for the moment. we re going to take a belief