he was working with mckelly. he said he wasn t doping but helping with the training regular minute. when lance started working with him, when he starts working with him, there were allegations about him even then. so the fact he chose to work with that doctor was highly suspicious. highly suspicious and came out in the news and lance s story was the same at the time. i m not working with him for doping purposes. i m working with him just to train. and that was also a brazen move that was very kind of characteristic of lance armstrong. he was working with a doping doct doctor or alleged doping doctor but thought he could control the criticism and deflect it criticism and for awhale it worked. is there a lesson to be learned? we think one of the morals to the story is that, you know, yes, cycling was a mess and armstrong was the master of it and others were doping and cheating, as well, but when you win at a rigged game, you re going to pay the steepest price