detail-oriented line of inquiry, questions about what the biden administration did, but also what they didn t do. what they should have done sooner. that may be something that we hear more from today. there was one question about afghan documents of afghans being burned at the embassy when u.s. diplomats left the embassy. secretary of state said that he would talk to them about that in a classified closed door setting. but today we are looking for some more details about what the biden administration did and when. lauren fox on the hill, thank you, kylie. lauren, what struck me was no actual knowledgement of any errors or mistakes. there was there were questions from democratic lawmakers, too. in the senate do you expect to see similar? reporter: look, i think democrats in the senate are poised today to really try to distinguish what could have been done differently and what was actually inherited by the biden administration when it came to that deal with the taliban.
democrats look to unwind that agenda violence? i m not saying why would they have to be violent if they win by the way? i m not saying there whether be violence. he is. okay. but i m saying should he say that? to pull back on what has been the legislative and other that s fine. that s not what he said. well, okay. i m telling you what i think is a concern, which is not a violence concern, but i think is a concern about pulling back and unwinding the success of this administration. i hear you about that. that s what happens when you go from one party to another. yeah. but saying it s violence. do you think that s the right thing for a president to do, to scare people like that about the outcome of an election? chris, i don t think that hopefully there won t be violence and i m not saying what the outcome is going to be. i agree with you. should the president go to people and say, help me because if we lose, there s going to be violence? i don
of the united states. jessica snyder is out front. reporter: the embattled attorney general facing new scrutiny as he s about to be grilled on capitol hill about his interactions with russians. cnn told it was revealed thursday in a closed door setting that he may have had a third meeting with sergey kislyak. it s an encounter he alluded to earlier many his testimony. we were also aware of facts that i can t discuss in an open setting that would make his continued participation problem attic. reporter: the possible meeting took place at the may flower hotel in washington where then-candidate donald trump was delivering his first major foreign policy address. sources say it may have been kpraj rated. a department of justice spokesperson said it never
the committee are heading over to langley, virginia to through law data that they are provide being what happened during the elections. they learned a lot about the russia attempts to influence the elections, but they are trying to figure out whether or not the trump associates colewded or coordinated or work with the russians in any way. that is one reason why i am told they want to hear directly from trump officials who had discussions with russian officials during the campaign. the former manager as well as michael flynn, a national security adviser who resigned after the discussions with the russian ambassador came to light. they are open to the issues of subpoenas in a closed door setting if they don t agree to the request to talk to them and
from one party to another. yeah. but saying it s violence. do you think that s the right thing for a president to do, to scare people like that about the outcome of an election? chris, i don t think that hopefully there won t be violence and i m not saying what the outcome is going to be. i agree with you. should the president go to people and say help me because if we lose there s going to be violence? i don t know the full context of the conversation and what he said out there, chris. i know it was a closed door setting. i know parts have been leaked out, but i d rather have the full context before i comment on that. all right, marc short. at least i know you re not contractually bound to defend stuff like that. you re just doing it because you want to. and you re welcome back here to make the case, and we re going to have you many times. marc short, thank you and be well. thanks. all right. so this google complaint, that it s rigged against the president has trum