Seans back on monday. The ingraham angle is up next. Have a terrific night. Welcome to washington. Im Laura Ingraham and this is the ingraham angle. We have a spectacular show for you tonight. You wouldnt know it watching msnbc, but there was another great economic report tonight. Well expose the blatant bias when it comes to exploring the president s accomplishments. That in a few moments. Plus, theres a new craze that involves jumping out of a moving car. What . Raymond arroyo will be here to explain it in the fridayay follies. Plus, some black pastors are facing backlash for meeting with President Trump. Unbelievable. Two of them will be here with me. But first, resisting for all the wrong reasons. Thats the focus of tonights angle. Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. Butt in an age of trump, lets face it, we have seen what that all could entail. And heres the mayor of ne
australia because we see a country like india as australia because we see a country like india as a potential strategic partner like india as a potential strategic partner in like india as a potential strategic partner in the pacific. all of this is related partner in the pacific. all of this is related and if australia can crack is related and if australia can crack energy security it can crack climate crack energy security it can crack climate change. it can also crack global climate change. it can also crack global security and on something that matters for us so much in our region that matters for us so much in our region which that matters for us so much in our region which has the edge on china. has this region which has the edge on china. has this accelerated the focus on energy security, the transition to my car will be interested to hear what everybody else says. it my car will be interested to hear what everybody else says. it seems to me it is balanced what e
vassal states. i am asking you. i don t think i can separate the sanctions don t think i can separate the sanctions from don t think i can separate the sanctions from the don t think i can separate the sanctions from the reasons . don t think i can separate the i sanctions from the reasons for don t think i can separate the - sanctions from the reasons for the sanctions sanctions from the reasons for the sanctions but sanctions from the reasons for the sanctions but i sanctions from the reasons for the sanctions but i think sanctions from the reasons for the sanctions but i think the sanctions from the reasons for the sanctions but i think the questionl sanctions but i think the question is an sanctions but i think the question is an interesting sanctions but i think the question is an interesting one. sanctions but i think the question is an interesting one. i sanctions but i think the question is an interesting one. i am - is an interesting one. i am uncomfortabl
need energy. we are sending them humanitarian call. it is need energy. we are sending them humanitarian call. humanitarian call. it is really good pr. not a humanitarian call. it is really good pr- not a dirty humanitarian call. it is really good pr. not a dirty fuel, humanitarian call. it is really good pr. not a dirty fuel, it humanitarian call. it is really good pr. not a dirty fuel, it is - pr. not a dirty fuel, it is humanitarian call.- pr. not a dirty fuel, it is humanitarian call. ., humanitarian call. scott morrison, who infamously humanitarian call. scott morrison, who infamously went humanitarian call. scott morrison, who infamously went into - humanitarian call. scott morrison, who infamously went into the - who infamously went into the australian parliament with a lump of coal saying australian parliament with a lump of coal saying don t be scared of this, he gets coal saying don t be scared of this, he gets up coal saying don t be scared of this, he gets up
like the liberal national coalition was going to lose yet it won and it appeared to wind because what labour were saying on energy the voters didn t like. can you remind us of that and well that still play this time? ., ., , . ., time? not even the last election, the last decade time? not even the last election, the last decade in time? not even the last election, the last decade in australia - time? not even the last election, the last decade in australia all. time? not even the last election, | the last decade in australia all the elections the last decade in australia all the elections have been written by climate elections have been written by climate change politics orthodoxy and i climate change politics orthodoxy and i don t expect that will change too much and i don t expect that will change too much of this election. but what we had too much of this election. but what we had for too much of this election. but what we had for the first time as a bipartisan we ha