everybody every day, why they don t like donald trump. we cannot play that game. we have to talk to ordinary americans about what we re going to do to make this better. anderson, sometimes, you know, social media is not accurate. you know, sometimes social media is, a lot of times, it s by activists and people who have great passion. but, you know, everybody s not watching this. there are people like getting up and going to work and going home and having dinner and, honey, how s it going? you know, those are things that s where people live. they don t live like on twitter. i mean, i like twitter, you like, we all do actually, i don t, but don t take that as a sense where people are. well, you know, howard, you re on twitter, you re good at it. that was me. i m on it, but i ve given it up. i try not to even look at it. but david axelrod wrote this thing essentially saying, look, let trump trump will destroy himself just by being himself. don t focus on that. governor d
do, do they want war? if they re being strangled in sanctions, obviously a war is costly not only in human lives, but, you know, for a country being strangled, it s not an easy thing to wage a war. it s not, but i think they re feeling as though they re getting strangled anyway. they re in a bad situation and wherever you put a country under that much pressure, they have less to lose. also, i think what s going on is there s an internal dynamic here in iran. there were people in iran who told rouhani zarand zarif, the iranian foreign minister, don t trust the americans and don t do this deal. it all played in parliament. don t do the nuclear deal? don t do the nuclear deal. the americans will double cross you, they ll draw, they ll put sanctions back and we ll destroy our nuclear facilities for nothing. and that s essentially exactly what happened. so the supreme leader is now listening to the hard liners, the hawks and the people in the revolutionary guard and perhaps this is th
extremes. and so, you know, beto, when he was running for the senate said, oh, i don t want to take your guns. now he turns around and says he has to, because he s got to get attention. does that mean that the pro-gun people are more stirred up because of what he said? now, some of them will run around and say, see, i told you so! do i think it stoked them up anymore? no, because they re all going to turn out and vote, and so are the other people, the people who are in favorable of reasonable gun control. they re going to turn out and vote. it s going to be, i believe, a mammoth turnout. so when we think about, are we stoking them up, maybe a little bit on the margins, but they re all coming. it s going to be some election. governor dean, do you agree that? the beto o rourke comment, the lewandowski hearing yesterday, which was sort of hyperpartisan spectacle and didn t seem to produce really all that many results or new information, certainly. and polling shows the majority of ameri
the guns. most people, like about 68% of people believe that assault weapons should be banned. that s pretty stunning. but that s different than taking a forced buyback, which is essentially confiscating but banning is at least you get money with a buy pac. but the last ban, as you know, was just for new weapons, it wasn t taking weapons that were there are out there. right, but, look, i m just telling you what americans believe. they believe assault weapons ought to be banned and high-content magazines ought to be banned. so i don t think that hurts beto at all. this is just i never read the president s tweets, but apparently he tweeted about that. you know, so what? okay, john is right, and i want the democrats to listen to this. if we are talking about donald trump with three months to go, we lose, period. this campaign cannot be run on what a jerk donald trump is. it has to be run on what the democrats are going to do that s going to be better. so trump will say this,
inspectors that go into iran to take a look because the u.s. does not have full diplomatic relations with iran. what does the administration say about that? that was a concession made during this negotiating process and it s essentially because the iranians don t trust the americans to do a credible job of inspections so what you ll see unfold i think, wolf is yes you re going to have a daily routine inspection of the known sites that have been a part of the iranian nuclear lexicon for some five or six years now. the question becomes what happens with these suspicious sites and that s where you get into a cat-and-mouse game. there s been a lot of talk and the israelis have been demanding this notion of any time anywhere access to sites around the country. administration officials have set that s a myth, there s no country on earth that will allow international inspectors to go anywhere at any time it s not going to happen so you have to see unfold here is this negotiated process and