this, in order to be legitimate it had to be bipartisan, she was resistant to it, they were still able to make her do it. howie: clarence, the only person been doing news is president trump with 68 million followers, but that changed friday, joe biden spoke to des moines register said he wasn t going to show up if the senate trial subpoenaed him, quite frankly this would be a distraction, all the coverage would be about him and trump would get off the hook, there was backlash, he went on twitter, i would comply with a legal subpoena but i don t see a legal subpoena, i haven t seen much criticism of biden s original answer or the fact that he s backing off a bit. the answer that he gave was in an editorial board meeting where he was speaking off the cuff, i think he realized that realized rather quickly it s hard to charge president trump with lack of cooperation with an investigation if he doesn t cooperate with investigation on the senate side, so it s he s
critics of the president s approach to north korea, personal diplomacy, isn t it fair to ask what the president has to show after years with kim? when you look at the media coverage, of course, they will take the former national security advisers comments and play them up and donald trump has no one but himself to blame, if he has had any failure in presidency, it is his personnel choices and putting someone like bolton, that was his own decision to do that and so to have the person complaining how would the media not pay attention to it, it is funny that they used to hate him and now love him because critical of the president. howie: this is not a case with private luncheon, he made decision to speak on the record
subscribers, let s be frank about it, we have gained 3 times as many subscribers. howie: evangelical leaders rallied around the president, ripped the magazine for disdainful dismissive elitist posture to fellow christians, choosing publication of joining team trump. you re a former religion reporter, you ve written in the for christian magazine. it is not far-left magazine, it s not entirely surprising that they wrote something like this, they are people who said similar things about bill clinton when he was going through impeachment battle, at the same time i m not sure how influential editorial was in terms of changing anyone s opinion because of the way it was written, first of all, required a belief democratic case of impeachment which a lot of people polls show never have
years of savings and service. what, we re just gonna swap over? yep. pump the breaks on this, swap it over to that. pump the breaks, and, uh, swap over? that s right. instead of all this that i ve already-? yeah. what are we gonna do with these? keep it at your desk, and save it for next time. geico. over 75 years of savings and service.
people can in good faith and in good conscious come to different political decisions on impeachment and who they are going to vote for and when you burden the conscious of people by saying you must support trump or demand his ouster either by impeachment or voting, this adds to scripture in a way that s not very evangelical. in a way retiring republican congressman who doesn t like trump taking his last shot, but, look, absolutely clear from some of the evangelical leaders that the president retains very strong, if not overwhelming support in the evangelical community for parts of the reasons you cited. i m not sure, i think that that christianity today has editorial position and they have been consistent about it, what s interesting is how the media discovered christianity today only when they wrote the editorial and made it out to be something so influential without paying attention to all of its other writings and what not over