used that in the course of this investigation. but you don t know the last part. it s not in this report. they said they did not follow normal fbi protocol. it says in the report that looking at the decisions that were made in the investigation, he didn t see proof of bias. and look, the biggest fact for him, and reaching that conclusion is they didn t leak. they never no confidence that the decision was free of bias. if that s not saying bias impacted peter struck s behavior, the lead sergeant, the guy who launched the trump organization and said we ll stop trump and later says don t worry, we got an insurance policy, if that doesn t show bias impact into this, i don t know what does. but you re taking what the ig said with specific context to his priority of weaner versus the russia probe. and the inspector general makes a point of saying no, don t go
abling agents. they found it. i don t like he s going to win. don t worry, we ll fx it. that s tantalizing. you re all over it. the bad fact is they conclude that there was no impact. and there was no exercise of that bias on any of the decisions. really? yeah. i mean, well, i mean, chris, come on. they say we do not have confidence that the decision was free from bias. so his bias did impact his decision. they say it. i ve looked at a lot more of these in respect general reports when they targeted conservatives. let s stick on this one. this is some of the hardest language i ve seen. snow was not free from bias that impacted his decision. no. they say it impacted his decision of prioritizing the russia investigation over the clinton investigation. but in terms of the decisions that were made, and the conclusions that were drawn, they say there was no impact. you can t run away from that.
the trouble i got in for just doing that. well, you got in trouble for how you were rounding people up and what you were doing with your resources. okay. that s uncertain, one judge. i m going to tell you something, i wrote a 25-page letter to the attorney general of the united states. i expect him to look into certain bias and the illegal immigration problem and the corruption and the politics, so we ll see what the bottom line is. do you include the huge factories and businesses that hire these people at sub par wages and don t have to worry about work conditions the same way because they re not citizens? did you include that in the letter? about raiding places that hire illegals? not to round up illegals but arrest the people that run the shop, joe? of course. is that in your letter? well, it s bigger than that. my letter has to do with the politics and this illegal immigration problem and the bias. all i m saying is this, joe.
point, they didn t do the easiest thing that would have been the hardest to trace to follow up on their supposed bias which is leak about the trump probe during the election. comey decided not to talk about it. only talk about the clinton one. but if these people wanted to get trump so much, why didn t they leak they were looking at him? because they were all convinced clinton was going to win. no. that doesn t follow logically. if you wanted to get trump, you would have done that. let me get to the other points. they opened the investigation on july 31st. peter strzok. eight days later, stop trump. six days later, insurance policy. if that don t show bias and intent to do harm. but he didn t follow through on this which this inspector general was obviously looking for. you know how exacting this report is. comey is bad it says in here. he did inappropriate things. there s no question about it. but he also said this. which i want your take on.
the russia investigation over the clinton investigation. but in terms of the decisions that were made, and the conclusions that were drawn, they say there was no impact. you can t run away from that. i mean, chris, five biassed people. they happen to be the top people at the fbi who ran the clinton investigation and by the way, went to the russia investigation and oh, by the way, three of those five were put on mueller s team. and it shows how biassed they were. no. it shows there was accountability. the inspector general saying we do not have confidence. in other words, they had no decision that the decision was free from bias. he was trying to say get focussed on russia. they also say there were no conclusions. because we have to stop trump. that s his words, not mine, the guy who ran the clinton investigation. he didn t do anything to do that, including, and i think this is the toughest thing for you to handle in terms of your perspective on this, if struck