pete: yorestingyou worked? pete: yes, i did. as steve said all eyes on capitol hill as nancy pelosi and chuck schumer calling on president trump to testify in front of house impeachment investigators? ainsley: that s right it. comes as week two of public impeachment hearings is getting underway. steve: griff jenkins joins us live from washington. griff, when is the president going to sit down with nancy and chuck? that sounds great, right? griff: don t hold your breath. here comes another week of hearings as the president is fighting back on twitter brassing the inquiry. the crazed do nothing democrats are turning impeachment into partisan weapon. it s very bad for our country and not what the founders had in mind. one witness not scheduled is the president, though speaker pelosi is extending that invitation. the president could come right before the committee and talk, speak all the truth that he wants if he wants to. you don t expect him to do that. if he wants to take the oath
on behalf of foreign governments and feeling to register, particularly someone like tony podesta, which it was at least reported that he something similar on behalf of the ukraine. so that strikes me, if you go after them on that specifically, when it s not equally applied, that raises questions. melissa: if they don t respond to the subpoenas chris: don t hold your breath. melissa: a link which is in court? what happens from there? chris: it will languish in court. they can order the rest of members of the executive. harris: we saw members of the house call for that just last week. chris: yes, we did. i would say it s unlikely. if eric holder was stonewalled and was aggressive by republicans wanted to get home, i think the executive will do that again. this is the problem the executive faces. they are saying it s unconstitutional. let s democrats are doing. it s constitutional. there are no rules in the constitution on how to impeach anybody. harris: which of the argum
dana: media coverage of asking facebook to do that, like i will not play that game. geraldo: cnn is not running trump ads. i hope they are diligent in stopping the democratic ads filled with hyperbole and exact duration. judge jeanine: don t hold your breath. dana: coming up a violent video attack that many are calling hypocrisy, the outrage, we will explain next. with this key to the city. [ applause ] it s an honor to tell you that liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. and now we need to get back to work. [ applause and band playing ] only pay for what you need. liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty.
reporting on this, whatrs devin nunes discovered, when lindsey graham discovered, the new york times was in there but they wanted to shape the narrativeco and i m going to tell you what is absolutely frightening right now, what really is stunning, is that they are going to try to shape the narrative on racism. this is extraordinarily dangerous. particularly coming from the new york times that ran an anti-semitic cartoon globally with president trump and netanyahu. they actually had to end their cartoons in the newspaper because of this. now they are going to try to shape this racist agenda, and i want the american people to realize that this is absolutely wrong. this is backwards. the executive editor should be ashamed, should be fired, should be fired from the new york times, and we should get back to reporting real t stories and letting the american people see what the evidence is. sean: don t hold your breath, sara. not going to happen. jeff, you worked for the reagan admini
charges regarding obstruction, please help me find out if sean: don t hold your breath senator. you are going to suffocate the deal died here but jim jordan, here s the thing. as bad as i thought pfizer was going to be, premeditated fraud, denying the constitutional civil liberties of one american for no darn good reason at all, based on the opposition paid for a russian lies, all, as the new york times suggests, there was probably come from the get-go, it was likely russian disinformation. which means that it looks like the russians might have really wanted hillary to win in the end but here s the question. as bad as premeditated fraud on the fisa court is, it sounds like the horowitz report, which i think will lead to indictments, should come in my view, might be nothing, compared to what may become a durum report. well, we will have to see.