set this off with your reporting about relief. i want to follow up on this and show you something that attorney benjamin crump said before the verdict about the importance of the videotape. i don t want us to have this precedence where if minorities are killed by white people that we have this high standard where we have to have a video to get justice. i m thinking about breonna taylor. i m thinking about so many others where there was no video. we can t create this precedent where if you don t have video and an unarmed black person is killed, reverend baker that we say they don t get due process. they don t get their day in court. i know video is important, but it cannot be the only they think only thing that gives black people access to the courtroom. and this has been mentioned
adult, or any senator who would say that they get to judge your guilt and without a charge send you to indefinite detention. these are the same people who are also arguing that the laws of war apply to america, because america is the battlefield. in the law of war, the conclusion to that is that you don t get due process. so what they re arguing for is alarming. every american should be alarmeded and worried about the philosophy behind their arguments. and i understand what you re saying. i get the logic of that. but, you know, you ve said in the past that you would have convicted al awlaki of treason, and you wouldn t have been against a drone strike against him. how can you be all right with al awlaki killed in yemen by a drone, and not be okay with him being killed by a drone here if he s an enemy combatant plotting against america in america. i think, in america, we have a doctrine of lethal force if
noble cause, jumping for the wounded warrior program earlier this week in florida. he did. mike, talk about the tradition you have with your family and your boys going down every year to watch a little grapefruit league baseball. reporter: yeah, well, thanks for bringing that up, willie, because it really is something. this is 21 straight years that our two oldest boys and now our youngest boy, timmy, who s 20, nick is 28. collin is 27. 21 straight years that we ve come to florida for spring training. it s just great. it s great for everyone. it gives you exposure to baseball, obviously. but more importantly, it gives you a chance to spend some time with your kids that you ordinarily don t get to spend this kind of time with them. 21 straight years. of course, we have our big fantasy baseball league draft here on saturday. i m in a fantasy league along with my boys and several other people. and i intend to win it all this year. hey, mike, i m curious, you were talking about your
have friends who are terrorists, somehow, you are without getting a trial by jury. these are the same two senators that argued in favor of indefinite detention, which means, and i asked senator mccain this directly, i said, does this mean you could take an american citizen, without a trial, and send them to guantanamo bay for the rest of their life, without ever charging them, and he said, yes, if they re a safety risk. who gets to decide? senator mccain? does he get to decide if you re an enemy combatant? i m alarmed by anybody, any adult, or any senator who would say that they get to judge your guilt and without a charge send you to indefinite detention. these are the same people who are also arguing that the laws of war apply to america, because america is the battlefield. in the law of war, the conclusion to that is that you don t get due process. so what they re arguing for is alarming. every american should be
conclusion to that is that you don t get due process. so what they re arguing for is alarming. every american should be alarmeded and worried about the philosophy behind their arguments. and i understand what you re saying. i get the logic of that. but, you know, you ve said in the past that you would have convicted al awlaki of treason, and you wouldn t have been against a drone strike against him. how can you be all right with al awlaki killed in yemen by a drone, and not be okay with him being killed by a drone here if he s an enemy combatant plotting against america in america. i think, in america, we have a doctrine of lethal force if you re using lethal force. a person named awlaki has a grenade launcher on his shoulder, they can be wiped out with lethal force by the police, by the fbi. if you re robbing a liquor store