take over. new york times, telling her there s still four votes. there is a traditional way to do things. in the old days, democrats and republicans, nothing came to the floor unless you knew what was going to happen. things were cooked in committee. things were cooked in private negotiations. their point is you see it with congressman green on the floor. why can t we just have votes? if we have ideas, let s have votes. this is, again, more of the conversation. we were talking about the tension between speaker pelosi and these four new members. they say yeah, sure there s tension, but so what? it s no big deal. i don t feel a fracture. yeah, i don t. i don t. just as there are members who challenge her conclusions, who
it or send it back to the house judiciary committee stalling it that way. nevertheless democrats are not eager to move forward. they believe it s premature. they believe they should wait for the mueller report. people like nancy pelosi who oppose moving forward on impeachment proceedings at the moment. al green is a supporter of this measure told me today that there s enough evidence to imimpeach this president. he s not pointing to obstruction of justice, he s pointsing ipo racism. today we have an opportunity to punish as a result of what we did yesterday. the president doesn t suffer any harm. he won t pay a fine or lose his job. today we have the opportunity to punish. very similar to going to court but you have a bifurcated process. first part of the trial you convict. second part you punish. your colleagues say why not wait until after the mueller hearing? you don t delay justice. mueller hearing has nothing to
before. educational documentaries daily and weekly shows and don t forget about us. your quick fix with diamond and silk and by the way this service is also available on your computer and at foxnews.com and even to the fox nation app. so let s get the party started right down though the fox nation app or visit fox nation.com. don t delay sign up today. you can hear what all of the
capri: we will take the jobs come on man! my neck of the woods is ready. david: one thing her idea plays into is one thing that we thought trump and democrats could compromise on, infrastructure. if this could be put in the realm of infrastructure melissa: that s a great idea. david: as opposed to the realm of border security harris: why is it that we can come up with ideas here among the five of us, yet all of those 500 plus in the melissa: let me tell you the answer, because they are busy tweeting stuff like this. this is senator chris van hollen, democrat from maryland. he says send it democrats should block consideration of any bills unrelated to opening the government until senator mitch mcconnell and republicans allowed to vote on the bipartisan bills the house passed joe from the government. mitch, don t delay. let s vote! in other words, david, they are playing games answering molotov cocktails or spitballs. wads of gum. david: doesn t all this
have the experience, they recognize that it s necessary not only from a pragmatic standpoint but a political standpoint as well to wait for the results of the mueller investigation to identify whether or not there is something tangible there to go down this road. impeachment is incredibly serious. we unfortunately have gone to a point, not only in my party but in the media and across the country, throwing around impeachment as if it s some kind of game. it s not. it is serious business. frankly, the everything people need to remember is that impeachment does not guarantee removal of the president either. everybody needs to harris: a political answer to what s going on. which is why i think, david, they don t want to necessarily wait for evidence because it may work against our cost potentially. we don t know. we don t know what robert mueller has. david: president trump gets a lot of flak for getting things wrong, but the impeach crowd in the democratic party get a fundamental th