including interior designer, lulu lytle who was not a member of number 10 staff but was there in downing street helping renovating boris johnson s flat. the organisers are understood to have laid on a cake and some m&s nibbles, with the gathering lasting some 20 30 minutes. the prime minister we are told only attended for around ten minutes. and they have denied reports he attended a later party with friends and family in the downing street flat. the leader of the opposition labour party has said the prime minister has to go. party has said the prime minister has to no. . . , party has said the prime minister hastouo. , ., . has to go. this is yet more evidence of a prime has to go. this is yet more evidence of a prime minister has to go. this is yet more evidence of a prime minister who has to go. this is yet more evidence of a prime minister who believes - of a prime minister who believes that the of a prime minister who believes that the rules that he made don t apply t
here and you said, no, there are none. could she could he be charged? i don t think so. could he? certainly not. right. the one and one thing that, you know, statutes of limitations, however, don t apply to is the question of should you be elevated from one, you know, lifetime appointment on the d.c. circuit of appeals to a lifetime appointment on the supreme court. the fact that there are no possible legal consequences here doesn t you know, doesn t answer the question of whether you should a senator should support his elevation, which is really a question that doesn t have a legal answer. it just has, you know, a kind of oath of office and accountability to voters kind of answer. so, john, emma talked about the concerns obviously that dr. ford had about coming forward.
comey and he was one who authored the letter recommending the firing of james comey and he was the one who appointed mueller. he also signed off on the surveillance warrants. now his own department s stonewalling congress to find the documentation for the warrant. now he is overseeing this entire investigation. it just seems like when you look at the way hillary was treated and you look at the conflicts rosenstein has, the president feels like he s being unfairly treated here, kimberly. the rules apply to other people that don t apply to other him. kimberly: he has been vocal and transparent about his upset and the fact that he thinks this was unfair that this investigation was supposed to be about one thing but now it seems to be very personal to try to unseat the american president, duly elected. people are going to feel very strongly across the country. you have seen some reaction and greg has touched on it. now he is faced with another decision which is it s an
politics with us now for more on the trump versus hillary battle. if anyone was going to link bill clinton s infidelity to hillary clinton s run for the white house, it was most likely going to be donald trump because i guess for almost anyone else, this would backfire. but this is donald trump. and the rules don t apply. the rules don t apply to donald trump. and you have to imagine if he brought this out back whether he was launching his presidential campaign, we might looking at this a little differently. we ve gone through six months of seeing donald trump say incendiary thing that would have tanked any other presidential candidate. so donald trump can really say whatever he wants. it s a totally different bar. the rules don t apply to him. look, he s doing two things here. he s going after bill clinton because he knows bill clinton is going to be the attack dog. he was hillary clinton s attack dog in 2008, and he s trying to get under hillary clinton s skin and run a general ele