who was against the law change. what sort of message has this sent out? and not only to the public and political opponents but also those in his own government? it is frightening people, what they are doing. this will change israel completely. it will no longer be the democracy that we know of it, and we have friends in the region who embarked on the abraham accords who said, we made peace with israel as a democratic nation. we don t want israel s look anything like hamas or the taliban or anything like that. with this being done, israel will look like that. so the israeli society is up in arms and the religious right candidly is made up of people who don t work, don t pay taxes and don t serve in the military. so that is fuelling the anger of people of the middle of the road and left and the right, you know, benjamin netanyahu s party, the likud party, and members of his own party are not in favour of this judicial overhaul because they
it is frightening people, what they are doing. this will change israel completely. it will no longer be the democracy that we know of it, and we have friends in the region who embarked on the abraham accords who said we made peace with israel as a democratic nation. we don t want israel to look anything like hamas or the taliban or anything like that. with this being done, israel will look like that. so the israeli society is up in arms and the religious right candidly is made up of people who don t work, don t pay taxes and don t serve in the military. so that is fueling the anger of people of the middle of the road and left and the right, you know, benjamin netanyahu s party, the likud party, and members of his own party are not in favour of this judicial overhaul because they see it as so disruptive
change israel completely. it will no longer be the democracy that we know of it, and we have friends in the region who embarked on the abraham accords who said we made peace with israel as a democratic nation. we don t want israel s look anything like hamas or the taliban or anything like that. with this being done, israel will look like that. so the israeli society is up in arms and the religious right candidly is made up of people who don t work, don t pay taxes and don t serve in the military. so that is feeling the anger of people of the middle of the road and left and the right, you know, benjamin netanyahu s party, the likud party, and members of his own party are not in fable of this judicial overhaul because they see it as so disruptive to israeli society, you have the military saying it will undermine the morale in israel and there are reservists and elite commandos that say they won t serve if this legislation goes through and there is going
to avoid contagion in the american banking system. fdic is funded by american taxpayers. how can you say it isn t a bail out? they made an argument they are going to tax the banks. number one, they had a sale for this bank. they could have sold it. they had a sale, a company that was ready to buy the bank and they didn t sell it. if you want to help the depositors, make it so taxpayers don t pay, sell the bank. a very, very clean solution. next, they claim they are going to tax the banks to pay for this. the banks will raise fees and consulers will pay the fees. no way the taxpayers don t pay for this. sandra: and the regional banks, they moved it into the big banks and to your point, the big banks are baling out the little banks and they can raise fees. larry kudlow, i was on with him last night, andy, our good
something that is new. and it s something that back during the civil war, happened, of course in the united states, between the unions and the confederates, that was balloons. this overtly is new. i don t think china frankly cares that we re aware of, it and that they got caught. i think they re getting the information trains furred back to, then they don t need this balloon physically back to themselves. whatever information they re picking, up they likely already have. and as you talk about intelligence, i wonder if you could talk a bit about u.s. and china relations. antony blinken, secretary of state, he would ve been for my understanding, the first secretary of state in four years to go to china. that trump is now been abruptly postponed, maybe even canceled. what do we know about the impact of this on u.s. relations with china? there is perhaps no more important relationship to the united states. because of the threat of china, then china. so this happening is certainly y