Michigan, north carolina, wisconsin, arizona and georgia. I will even add pennsylvania. Right now donald trump is leading in those states, and those states are where he lost in some cases by as you have just a view thousand votes in 2020. This will be a tight race and i believe that americas voters, i agree with stephanie that many voters might have been shut out of the close primary process, but the majority of the voters right now in america chose to shut themselves out of their primary process so far. And that is why you have low turnout, that is why you have the candidates you do. As a general election comes to a head in november, i think will see the excitement of the voters. , ,. , voters. The voters did show up in they have voters. The voters did show up in they have overwhelmingly. In they have overwhelmingly picked in they have overwhelmingly picked these in they have overwhelmingly picked these two in they have overwhelmingly| picked these two candidates. That picked these tw
i m getting vaccinated. .with pfizer s pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine. so am i. because i m at risk for pneumococcal pneumonia. i already got a pneumonia vaccine, .but i m asking about the added protection of prevnar 20®. if you re 19 or older with certain chronic conditions. .like asthma, diabetes, copd, or heart disease,. .or are 65 or older, you are at increased. .risk for pneumococcal pneumonia. prevnar 20® is approved in adults. .to help prevent infections from 20 strains of the bacteria. .that cause pneumococcal pneumonia. in just one dose. don t get prevnar 20® if you ve had a severe. .allergic reaction to the vaccine or its ingredients. adults with weakened immune systems. . may have a lower response to the vaccine. the most common side effects were pain and swelling at the injection site,. . muscle pain, fatigue, headache, and joint pain. i want to be able to keep my plans. i don t want to risk ending up in the hospital with pneumococcal pneumonia. that s why i ch
distinguished supreme court practitioner, laurence tribe. harvard historian, yell historian, and of course on this important night we are fortunate to hear from to law professors who are also practitioners, andrew weissmann, and neal katyal. neil katyal is of course a distinguished supreme court practitioner, having argued 50 cases before the court, and andrew weissmann is a former federal prosecutor and justice department official. my mission therefore in this hour is to get out of the way so that you can hear from them and not me. but i, want to take a minute to begin with two things that may reside more in the category of pet peeves than scholarly discussion that you are about to hear from our guests. one is that clarence thomas should ve recused himself from this case because everyone on that bench today knew, clarence thomas s wife was there. she was there, she was present when donald trump incited engaged in insurrection. the essence of our case is president trump s o
just say, your point is that there s no ambiguity with having a list and not having president in it with having a history that suggests they were really focussed on local concerns in the south, with this conversation where the legislators actually discussed what looked like an ambiguity, you are saying there s no ambiguity in section 3? let me take the point specifically about electors and senators, if i might. yes. that might be important. presidential electors were not covered, because they don t hold an office. they vote. i m talking about the barred office part of this. exactly. the barred if you want to include everybody, first you have to suppress phi presidential electors. they wouldn t fall under any office. secretary of all, senators and representatives don t hold office either. the constitution tells us that and refers to them as holding seats, not offices. you want to make sure there s no doubt that senators and representatives are covered given the con
times. justice jackson: no. i m not going to that. let me just say so your point is that there is no ambiguity with having a list and not having president in it with having a history that suggest that they were really focused on local concerns in the south with this conversation where the legislators actually discussed you are saying there is no they vote. justice jackson: i m talking about the barred office part of this. jason murray: barred office is if you want to include everybody first presidential electors they are not offices so they wouldn t fall under any office. second of all senators and representatives don t hold office either. the tells us under the incompatibility clause refers to them as holding seats not offices. you want to make sure there is no doubt that senators and representatives are covered given that the constitution suggests otherwise, you have to include them. the constitution says the presidency holds an office as do members of this court. and