you should show up, we can get the job done for this country. that report is false. bill: here is snapshot of polling in hawkeye state. donald trump with enormous lead at 51%. desantis 19% and haley above 16%. trump with huge lead. iowaans telling us they don t care about the polls, they don t trust the poll and don t apply here. this is the caucus system. it is a bunch of neighbors getting together to talk to each other and find out who they support. this video of nikki haley and governor desantis in iowa. iowans feel if either have a strong second place finish it is considered a success or strong night for them. they don t have to come in first place and voters want them to
it. who come into the doors of emergency rooms and hospitals, and banned states, and have been refused the lifesaving care that they need. we certainly have seen stories in texas, in idaho, and elsewhere, where women s lives have literally been threatened. their future fertility has been threatened. yet, there are exceptions on the books that say that this shouldn t be the case. and it s just, really, an example of the fact that when an abortion ban is put in place, exceptions really are meaningless. they are window dressing to make people feel like somehow these lawmakers are being reasonable in some way, and putting these abortion bans in place are with exceptions. and, reality the exceptions really don t apply. they re going to argue against the application of their own exceptions all the way to the supreme court. so, as you know, there s a similar case that s ongoing in your state of texas.
longer prestigious place, it is place to go to conform think and get dumber and they will be worse employees for you. i don t think they will change. brian: we heard rumblings wall street saying you were protesting for hamas, don t apply here for internship or a job. how many times harvard resumes going to the top of the pile, maybe they go to the bottom in a lot of places. pete: i think so. you already saw it from some law firms when it comes to yale and harvard law with radical law fair that emanates from students. if you try to win cases and get law students talking about pronouns and oppressor and oppressed, that is impediment to doing your job. i think the same will take place across any number of different
david, i wanted to read you this quote from a former u.s. attorney, john fishhook, jr. quoted in the wall street journal. a claim that his sfeech was protected by first amendment and acted in good faith, the two arguments could be at odds with each other. if you say, i m a liar, and the first amendment lets me do that, that undercuts your good faith defense. talk about how this all playing out, david. i think they re using stale talking points in pushing this first amendment defense. they had this you had in case he was charged with conspiracy, but he wasn t. thee using the old talking points where they really don t apply. speech in service of a crime is not protected speech. we prosecutor a lot of people in this office who engage in criminal speech. there was a woman recently who we convicted of soliciting a hit map to try to kill her husband.
sent over seas. this march has been reversed by three separate injuries, he was reversed by an 8-0 supreme court, as i explained on sunday, he takes statute that is don t apply, takes statutes and rewrites them. he knows he is in washington d.c., grand jury in washington d.c., he has the worse radical left wing obama judge in america, somehow gets the case. she is in charge of the case. he is going to indict trump for drinking too much orange juice and everybody would say great, he is not above the law. let me tell you something else. this case in florida, this documents case, you also have former federal prosecutors, that s a serious case. that is an unserious case. there are motions to be filed here, he brought that case in washington d.c. in the wrong venue purposely. he wanted to indict trump in washington with democrat grand jurors and then he says by the way we are moving