Taken on a level Playing Field and in the normal course of this scope we interact on gates and with our demaio t. To work through these issues and the state department to work through these issues. This is an issue that hurts part of the industry, but there are other parts of the industry and us that are perfectly happy with the status quo. An issue of where you stood is where you stand . Let me try that one. The issue is we care the most because it affects us the most. Our our employees are here because they understand the effect it will have on them. Those other organizations you describe other do not understand the situation or have the view that it does not concern the. It certainly is it certainly is better for them. Here is the reality. Today we are already experiencing some. And that is real damage, but what we see in europe and will happen here if i government allows for what we will see is more into the United States from points not ago. That has a material potential impact. O
With those extraordinary cost not necessarily the cost itself but opprobrious storage to archive and catalog so that evidence could be used to the appropriate manner. Prosecutors are also concerned with storage irretrievable. We have obligations to present this evidence to Defense Attorneys. We must know which portion of a recording pertains to a specific case to distribute that to the bar. That leads to the question what is the broader responsibility to the public . Many have open records laws that mandate much of the information much the list be disclosed where is a fine line to collect the evidence and what we will be distributing to the public at large and as has been testified it gives a different perspective. Three are optimistic of the possibility of body warned carews then used appropriately kim be said to will for lawenforcement and prosecutors. Thank you mr. Chairman. Good afternoon chairman gramm, Ranking Member in members of the subcommittee i am president and ceo of the Le