in these emails and texts that we saw, with some of their questions and acknowledgments that maybe there should be a range of factors that were considered beyond just the actual data of the outcome of the election and the results in arizona. that s pretty disheartening. there are stronger words to use than that, because these are people and individuals who fox helps as their mainstream reporters, there are people who are fair and balanced, who maybe a little slanted, but we did always think about them separately. if you are sitting in the white house right now looking at those texts in a democratic white house, i ll note, looking at those texts and emails, it kind of flies in the face of that. yeah, that s a great point. i think it s interesting and complicated. there are a whole thing is, we ve got straight news people and we ve got the opinion programming, and it s clear that like obviously the whole network is run by the same enterprise. then on the other side the opinion people a
soul stolen by various software companies as more time gainers. they re having the same reaction internally to the lies that anyone with a functioning critical faculty must-have. yeah. i think that s exactly right. in this latest batch of documents, some of which have been covered before, you see further evidence of this behind the scenes discussion among fox news hosts an executives and producers saying that they didn t believe the claims of sydney powell and rudy giuliani. and yet they continued to air them for weeks and to give them an essentially uncritical platform. and dominion has really assembled an impressively and strong amount of evidence demonstrating that at the time that fox was airing the claims of rudy giuliani and sidney powell and others, it knew that those statements were false and thus had actual malice, as you
when all in starts now. but good evening from new york, i m chris hayes, and in the wake of tucker carlson s attempt to discuss deceived his viewers about what happened on jerry six, the stuff we all saw with our own eyes in realtime, we also now have a troll of new documents related to foxes others massive and destructive deception, that would belong trumps big lie. some are not all of the newly released exhibits and dominion voting systems defamation system defense against fox, revealing all sorts of evidence showing that all kinds of fox, folks inside fox, host, management, knew they were broadcasting lies to their audience through the 2020 election, but they did it anyway and continued to do it keep their viewers and their shareholders happy. now of course patient zero of the big lie that fox spread far
maybe a little slanted, but we did always think about them separately. that s pretty disheartening. there are stronger words to use than that, because these are people and individuals who fox helps as their mainstream reporters, there are people who are fair and balanced, who maybe a little slanted, but we did always think about them separately. if you are sitting in the white house right now looking at those texts in a democratic white house, i ll note, looking at those texts and emails, it kind of flies in the face of that. yeah, that s a great point. i think it s interesting and complicated. there are a whole thing is, we ve got straight news people and we ve got the opinion programming, and it s clear that like obviously the whole network is run by the same enterprise. then on the other side the opinion people are ticked off at the straight news people who are part of the crew that were saying things in general like the election wasn t stolen, fact-checking a tweet. and then you
but i m wondering if it changes the way you think about the place. a bit, honestly. i mean, when i was in the white house there were people like peter, as much as he would ask questions that were slanted sometimes and a bit one-sided and lacking context, but peter like brett bear, martha mcallen, these are all people that we thought of as being different from tucker carlson and laura ingraham and sean hannity. in many ways they are, but also in these emails and texts that we saw, with some of their questions and acknowledgments that maybe there should be a range of factors that were considered beyond just the actual data of the outcome of the election and the results in arizona. that s pretty disheartening. there are stronger words to use than that, because these are people and individuals who fox helps as their mainstream reporters, there are people who are fair and balanced, who