I mean justices alito and thomas were making a point about the Supreme Court hearing disputes among states not the merit of this case. I think wed have been better served if the full court had said more. Such as when judge stefanos bibos of the Third Circuit appointed by donald trump recently overturned trump efforts to overturn election results. And he wrote voters not lawyers choose the president , ballots not briefs decide elections. Challenges of unfairness are serious, but calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here. Or when at the u. S. District court for the middle district of pennsylvania judge matthew brond, a former Federalist Society member wrote this in his opinion. This court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations unsupported by evidence. In the United States of america this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter let alone all t