how the court crazies that. i do want to ask you, though, mara, about, something that s always bothered me about section 230. and i guess i i have to admit here that i voted for it. like, back like in the ice age. i think it was 1996, because you didn t want, like, little internet companies that had comments down at the bottom getting in trouble if somebody put a comment at the end of a blog post, and so obviously things exploded, though, and you ve got these multibillion dollar corporations that make money off of hate speech. that make money off of allowing people to spread lies to millions and millions of people. and do the sort of things if the new york times did it, they would, the times would be put out of business. the idea that this is 1996 and we re talking about you ve got
mail or compuserve is completely asinine. isn t it time for congress to start holding mark zuckerberg and elon musk and other owners of these, these corporations, just to the same standard that everybody else is held to? why do we carve things out for i would have said jack dorsey before and i did say that a couple years ago. this is it s just insanity that we re allowing these billion dollar corporations to, to have an exemption that nobody else has. you know, joe, you re making a powerful case here that the law, maybe it just is out of date. i mean, listening to you talk about the way you were thinking about it when it was enacted is reason enough. you re right. the internet has changed. the world has changed, but this is one of those areas of american exceptionalism, too, other democracies look at us and say why can t you figure this
-ism. as for the bays, and contract to the we, the list keeps getting longer, and longer. it s black, folks and non-white folks. lgbt folks [inaudible] teachers, librarians, academics, the media, public health officials. woke billion dollar corporations. the so-called deep state. the fbi. just to name a few an ever-growing, internally inconsistent lists, of enemies the trumpism says has power into good away from you. and the fundamental thing the trump promised, basically from the moment he came down is, i will wait push those enemies way on your behalf and [inaudible] here s a, think he largely filled bagel. it s not to say the trump did not make life miserable for lots and lots of people. he succeeded in that. for instance the people in the administration kidnapped. or the countless, needless death analysis that resulted
take the senate and the house, we are going to see a reversal of the important gains we made including the reversal of the bill that we passed, to lower the cost of prescription drug drugs for seniors. they want to get rid of that. they want to get rid of the minimum percent tax of corporate making sure that corporations pay their fair share, instead of zero, like many billion dollar corporations. that it would be great flap johnson will forward. a positive agenda. we need to make sure that mitch mcconnell is not in charge and not driving the country backwards. another issue that wasn t a big issue in last night s
incumbents and we are fighting hard to keep those. but what it would mean is another vote to work to try to codify roe v. wade nationally. it would be another vote to pass the john lewis voting rights act. it would be another bout to make sure that we have an economy to work for everybody instead of more tax cuts for the very rich and big corporations. if the republicans wanted to take the senate and the house, we are going to see a reversal of the important gains we made including the reversal of the bill that we passed, to lower the cost of prescription drug drugs for seniors. they want to get rid of that. they want to get rid of the minimum percent tax of corporate making sure that corporations pay their fair share, instead of zero, like many billion dollar corporations. that it would be great flap johnson will forward. a positive agenda. we need to make sure that mitch mcconnell is not in charge and