Is it a recommendation? i might choose to ignore it. it s me, it s not a directive. the president is acting like he s a regular citizen to say what he wants and pleases, it will have no ramifications. he is the president of the united states i know i say this over and over again. it stands repeating. the pvt. of the united states, leader of the free world, commander in chief right now, etching you say, everything you do has consequence bs and he doesn t seem to care. rouge ruin also said the upcoming mid-term elects are going to be about impeachment or now impeachment. is he right that this ultimately is a political issue? in many way, susan touched on this, this idea that mueller is unlikely to indict a sitting president, that s essentially doj guidelines and policy. so it will come down to what he says in whatever report or memo he comes up with in the next
Understand is jeff sessions didn t decide to recuse himself, he had to recuse himself, according to doj guidelines. president trump and his team should have known th. someone who is a campaign surrogate, someone who is essentially a validater for the campaignin to a position of attorney general, h choice whatsoever. yes, your broader point is absolutely true. president trump doesn t see our attorney general as the nation s top law enforcement officer. he sees the attorney general as his chief protector. as the president s chief protector. someone who will or ul i should say, if he were not recuserom th. do you mean how like michael cohen was president fixer when he was a private citizen, that s how he views jeff sessions? absolutely. or roy cohen, the president s former attorney. that s what president trump wants in all of this. someone not looking out for our nation s interest but someone
Telling you, he never had a legal leg to stand on. doj guidelines clearly state that a sitting president cannot be indicted. not to mention mueller doesn t have a reason to do so in the first place. mueller has zero evidence of collusion, has only been focused on the vault crimes of the president and it s not a crime to have thoughts. rudy guliani reacting to tomorrow being the one-year anniversary of mueller s corrupt investigation. here s part of the interview that will air with laura. take a look at this. what is the timeline for this to wrap up? they should do it today. as soon as possible. that i have the facts to write their report. you can write a fair report, fine. if you can write an unfair report, write it around we ll combat it. we re ready. the former new york city mayor is right about this. he told laura ingraham about the damage that this investigation is doing to this country.
Admitted and the shift memo did not contradict this. if they had not had the steel dossier. they woodland not have even submitted that. that s a shocking thing that fisa warrant. laura: in the devin nunes letter today, scott where he went chapters and verse about the doj guidelines, in part the accuracy of information contained within fisa applications is of utmost importance. only documented and verified information may be used to you support fbi applications, fisa, to the fisa court. they did not verify the outrageous allegations in this dossier and they couldn t. there was no way for them to, yet that was at the core of this application. was a federal statute violated in their submission of this fisa application. we will certainly never know that it seems to me et fundamental difference between democrats and republicans obviously is the republicans think it was the heart of that fisa warrant and the democrats think it was part of it.
Admitted and the shift memo did not contradict this. if they had not had the steel dossier. they woodland not have even submitted that. that s a shocking thing that fisa warrant. laura: in the devin nunes letter today, scott where he went chapters and verse about the doj guidelines, in part the accuracy of information contained within fisa applications is of utmost importance. only documented and verified information may be used to you support fbi applications, fisa, to the fisa court. they did not verify the outrageous allegations in this dossier and they couldn t. there was no way for them to, yet that was at the core of this application. was a federal statute violated in their submission of this fisa application. we will certainly never know that it seems to me et fundamental difference between democrats and republicans obviously is the republicans think it was the heart of that fisa warrant and the democrats think it was part of it.