bill clinton should not have gotten on that plane. tell me why donald trump can summon everyone to the white house and demand documents. tell me we deserve to know who s investigating all the trump people. the investigation is under way. do you think the witnesses should have ax to the information that they may be taken to court? that s witness tampering. from everything we saw in 2016, that absolutely need to happen. is this department of justice basically folding to his pressure? i think what the deputy attorney general did today or yesterday i forget when the meeting happened. so much has happened. i think he tried to buy himself some time and he didn t want to be on the receiving end of the president s twitter account. he did fold. this is a dangerous president. you do what he says. you start the investigation, kick it to the inspector general. what s to top the president from
going come up with conclusions in 30, 60, 90 days. i don t think the inspector general will be done by then. if mueller comes out and says, here s indictments or no indictments this investigation becomes irrelevant. i think that s why this might be a punt. so do you see this as a punt? something that won t go anywhere because there may be results for muler? the language is so beg and broad. we didn t see a statement from mueller today. the doj are not giving their opinion on this. i don t think it s a punt in the sense that the ig investigation isn t a real investigation, but there s also an investigation. texas expanding at the margins. the substantive difference from this morning is of timing and redirecting the president. there s a great deal to
infiltrate the campaign? i don t know. let s find out. do you think that s a possibility. i guess the question is, what would you like the fbi to have done if they had concerns the trump campaign might have been infiltrated? what should they have done? i don t know. i m not saying they shouldn t continue with that investigation. my concern is not what they should have done. my concern is to date, we have no evidence that s true. and i challenge anybody to give me evidence. if that s the case, how do you justify some of the activities of the senior department of justice and the fbi? how many times have we told the republican memo is a good example. national security, you re going endanger lives. they had not even seen it. you have all read it. i challenge you to find anything that s endangering national
deconstruct from today s news, from the white house, not the least of which the is the political a requisition at the center of the department of justice investigation. looking good!
campaign. we are not talking about the why. why did the fbi feel the need to have an informant approach george papadopoulos. well, the australians said he was dragging in a bar about the e-mail hacking. we need a three-month investigation. from then until donald trump standing up asking the russians to find the e-mails. paul manafort resigned in same. that is an incredible series of events that we are not talking aboutle we are not talking about the time line. we are sucked into this fake debate about spies. jason. i see it much differently. let s not gloss over this. the fact of the matter is the fbi or doj were running an outright entrapment effort.